We manage a fairly large nova-baremetal installation at Yahoo. And while we've
developed tools to hit the nova-bm API, we're planning to move to ironic
without any support for the nova BM API. Definitely no interest in the proxy
API from our end.
Sometimes you just need to let a thing die.
-Ja
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/10/2014 02:26 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
>> 1) Is this tested anywhere? There are no unit tests in the patch
>> and it's not clear to me that there would be any Tempest coverage
>> of this code path. Providing this and having it break a couple
>> of
On 09/10/2014 03:14 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> On 09/10/2014 01:13 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
>>> As far as I understand it, though, that's a patch for a
>>> read-only mode. It seems bizzare, and possibly dangerous, to
>>> proxy read commands, but not write commands. It gives the
>>> impression that everyt
> 1) Is this tested anywhere? There are no unit tests in the patch and
> it's not clear to me that there would be any Tempest coverage of this
> code path. Providing this and having it break a couple of months down
> the line seems worse than not providing it at all. This is obviously
> fixable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/10/2014 01:13 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
>> As far as I understand it, though, that's a patch for a
>> read-only mode. It seems bizzare, and possibly dangerous, to
>> proxy read commands, but not write commands. It gives the
>> impression that everyt
> As far as I understand it, though, that's a patch for a read-only
> mode. It seems bizzare, and possibly dangerous, to proxy read
> commands, but not write commands. It gives the impression that
> everything's fine until it's not fine (because someone tried to use
> an existing script to do a c
nd
> then having them discover later that something broke because they tried to
> create a node.
>
> Best Regards,
> Solly Ross
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Sean Dague"
>> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, Sep
r that something broke because they tried to create a node.
Best Regards,
Solly Ross
- Original Message -
> From: "Sean Dague"
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 10:33:05 AM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] On an API proxy
I thought it might be helpful to show a sample of the output from the
proxied commands: Please find the example here:
http://paste.openstack.org/show/Em861wMwFvrFlsWkugfX
Chris Krelle
NobodyCam
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 09/09/2014 11:22 PM, Russell Bryant wrote
On 09/09/2014 11:22 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 09/09/2014 05:24 PM, Michael Still wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> One of the last things blocking Ironic from graduating is deciding
>> whether or not we need a Nova API proxy for the old baremetal
>> extension to new fangled Ironic API. The TC has asked that
On 09/09/2014 05:24 PM, Michael Still wrote:
> Hi.
>
> One of the last things blocking Ironic from graduating is deciding
> whether or not we need a Nova API proxy for the old baremetal
> extension to new fangled Ironic API. The TC has asked that we discuss
> whether we think this functionality is
On 09/09/2014 04:24 PM, Michael Still wrote:
> Hi.
>
> One of the last things blocking Ironic from graduating is deciding
> whether or not we need a Nova API proxy for the old baremetal
> extension to new fangled Ironic API. The TC has asked that we discuss
> whether we think this functionality is
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Solly Ross wrote:
> With my admittedly limited knowledge of the whole Ironic process, the
> question seems to me to be: "If we don't implement a proxy, which people are
> going to have a serious problem?"
>
> Do we have an data on which users/operators are making
t anyway.
Best Regards,
Solly Ross
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Still"
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List"
> Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2014 5:24:11 PM
> Subject: [openstack-dev] On an API proxy from baremetal to ironic
>
> Hi.
>
>
Hi.
One of the last things blocking Ironic from graduating is deciding
whether or not we need a Nova API proxy for the old baremetal
extension to new fangled Ironic API. The TC has asked that we discuss
whether we think this functionality is actually necessary.
It should be noted that we're _not_
15 matches
Mail list logo
