Developer Lounge at 1 PM today!!
Thanks,
Sandhya
On 5/12/14 10:23 AM, "Irena Berezovsky" wrote:
>Hi all,
>Where are we going to meet for this meeting at 1:00 pm today?
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Robert Li (baoli) [mailto:ba...@cisco.com]
>Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 10:52 PM
>To: Sandh
Hi all,
Where are we going to meet for this meeting at 1:00 pm today?
-Original Message-
From: Robert Li (baoli) [mailto:ba...@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 10:52 PM
To: Sandhya Dasu (sadasu); Brent Eagles; Steve Gordon
Cc: Dan Smith; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for us
the program pods area should be open.
On 5/9/14, 3:33 PM, "Sandhya Dasu (sadasu)" wrote:
>I have no idea, how to pick a location.
>Should we meet at the Cisco booth at 1pm and then take it from there?
>
>Any other ideas?
>
>Thanks,
>sandhya
>
>On 5/9/14 3:17 PM, "Brent Eagles" wrote:
>
>>On 09/
Alternatively we can meet in the design area which seems like a better
location anyway.
Thanks,
Sandhya
On 5/9/14 3:33 PM, "Sandhya Dasu (sadasu)" wrote:
>I have no idea, how to pick a location.
>Should we meet at the Cisco booth at 1pm and then take it from there?
>
>Any other ideas?
>
>Thanks
I have no idea, how to pick a location.
Should we meet at the Cisco booth at 1pm and then take it from there?
Any other ideas?
Thanks,
sandhya
On 5/9/14 3:17 PM, "Brent Eagles" wrote:
>On 09/05/14 04:21 PM, Sandhya Dasu (sadasu) wrote:
>> Thanks for all your replies.
>>
>> Thanks for the great
Works for me as well.
What would be the meeting place?
-Original Message-
From: Robert Li (baoli) [mailto:ba...@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 10:13 PM
To: Sandhya Dasu (sadasu); Steve Gordon
Cc: Dan Smith; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions);
John Garbut
On 09/05/14 04:21 PM, Sandhya Dasu (sadasu) wrote:
Thanks for all your replies.
Thanks for the great inputs on how to frame the discussion in the etherpad
so it becomes easier for people to get on board. We will add author indent
to track the source of the changes. Will work on cleaning that up.
It sounds good to me.
Thanks Sandhya for organizing it.
‹Robert
On 5/9/14, 2:51 PM, "Sandhya Dasu (sadasu)" wrote:
>Thanks for all your replies.
>
>Thanks for the great inputs on how to frame the discussion in the etherpad
>so it becomes easier for people to get on board. We will add author in
Thanks for all your replies.
Thanks for the great inputs on how to frame the discussion in the etherpad
so it becomes easier for people to get on board. We will add author indent
to track the source of the changes. Will work on cleaning that up.
Regarding the session itself, as you probably know,
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Li (baoli)"
> Subject: Re: Informal meeting before SR-IOV summit presentation
>
> This is the one that Irena created:
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/pci_passthrough_cross_project
Thanks, I missed this as it wasn't linked from the design summit Wik
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 08:40:01PM +, Robert Li (baoli) wrote:
>
> On 5/8/14, 4:33 PM, "Steve Gordon" wrote:
FWIW, it is nice to keep the author of a particular indent
level in the message
> >> Dan Smith wrote:
> >> What would be the purpose of doing that before the session? IMHO, a
> >>
This is the one that Irena created:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/pci_passthrough_cross_project
On 5/8/14, 4:33 PM, "Steve Gordon" wrote:
>- Original Message -
>> > It would be nice to have an informal discussion / unconference session
>> > before the actual summit session on SR-IOV.
- Original Message -
> > It would be nice to have an informal discussion / unconference session
> > before the actual summit session on SR-IOV. During the previous IRC
> > meeting, we were really close to identifying the different use cases.
> > There was a dangling discussion on introducin
- Original Message -
> Hi,
> It would be nice to have an informal discussion / unconference session
> before the actual summit session on SR-IOV. During the previous IRC
> meeting, we were really close to identifying the different use cases.
> There was a dangling discussion on introducin
> It would be nice to have an informal discussion / unconference session
> before the actual summit session on SR-IOV. During the previous IRC
> meeting, we were really close to identifying the different use cases.
> There was a dangling discussion on introducing another level of
> indirection betw
Hi,
It would be nice to have an informal discussion / unconference session
before the actual summit session on SR-IOV. During the previous IRC
meeting, we were really close to identifying the different use cases.
There was a dangling discussion on introducing another level of
indirection between
16 matches
Mail list logo
