[mailto:beyo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 9:44 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] DVR and FWaaS integration
Vivek,
I will try to join the DVR meeting. Since it conflicts with one of my other
meeting (from my real job), I may
@lists.openstack.org
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] DVR and FWaaS integration
The NS FW will be on a centralized node for sure. For the DVR + FWaaS
solution is really for EW traffic. If you are interested on the topic,
please propose your preferred meeting time and join the meeting so
that we can
S with the
>
> current DVR architecture, but there might be less takers on that.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Vivek
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Yi Sun [mailto:beyo...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 11:50 AM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.ope
same in N/S with the
current DVR architecture, but there might be less takers on that.
--
Thanks,
Vivek
From: Yi Sun [mailto:beyo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 11:50 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] DVR and FWaaS integration
The NS
ajeev; Gary Duan; Carl (OpenStack Neutron)
*??:*Re: [openstack-dev] DVR and FWaaS integration
All,
After talk to Carl and FWaaS team , Both sides suggested to call a
meeting to discuss about this topic in deeper detail. I heard that
Swami is traveling this week. So I guess the earliest time we can ha
; Gary Duan; Carl (OpenStack Neutron)
主题: Re: [openstack-dev] DVR and FWaaS integration
All,
After talk to Carl and FWaaS team , Both sides suggested to call a meeting to
discuss about this topic in deeper detail. I heard that Swami is traveling this
week. So I guess the earliest time we can have a
All,
After talk to Carl and FWaaS team , Both sides suggested to call a meeting
to discuss about this topic in deeper detail. I heard that Swami is
traveling this week. So I guess the earliest time we can have a meeting is
sometime next week. I will be out of town on monday, so any day after
Monday
Carl,
For the overlap IP, I was thinking about whether we could have a case
where two VMs have the same subnet but belongs to different network. So
if we create policy base on subnet, how will it work.
Yi
On 6/29/14, 12:43 PM, Carl Baldwin wrote:
In line...
On Jun 25, 2014 2:02 PM, "Yi Sun
From: Carl Baldwin [c...@ecbaldwin.net]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 3:43 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] DVR and FWaaS integration
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 3:43 AM, Carl Baldwin
mailto:c...@ecbaldwin.net>> wrote:
I
[mailto:richardwoo2...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2014年6月29日 12:23
收件人: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
主题: Re: [openstack-dev] DVR and FWaaS integration
Regarding of user case of this feature, are you referring E-W traffic or N-S
traffic?
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Yi Sun
mailto:beyo
In line...
On Jun 25, 2014 2:02 PM, "Yi Sun" wrote:
>
> All,
> During last summit, we were talking about the integration issues between
DVR and FWaaS. After the summit, I had one IRC meeting with DVR team. But
after that meeting I was tight up with my work and did not get time to
continue to foll
The east/west case is the only case with this asymmetric routing problem
being discussed. However, the north/south case might still be interesting
from a FWaaS perspective. The fact that the router is distributed in
pieces may affect it depending on the firewall implementation.
Carl
On Jun 28, 2
Regarding of user case of this feature, are you referring E-W traffic or
N-S traffic?
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Yi Sun wrote:
> All,
> During last summit, we were talking about the integration issues between
> DVR and FWaaS. After the summit, I had one IRC meeting with DVR team. But
> af
All,
During last summit, we were talking about the integration issues between
DVR and FWaaS. After the summit, I had one IRC meeting with DVR team. But
after that meeting I was tight up with my work and did not get time to
continue to follow up the issue. To not slow down the discussion, I'm
forwar
14 matches
Mail list logo