dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Microversioning implementation
Hongbin & team
Please forget Semantic Versioning API, that should not be done in short term
especially API WG had defined lots of Microversion API docs, sorry to make
confusions.
Of cause that Mic
e questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Microversioning implementation
I was completely unaware of any discussion of Semantic Versioning.
That was brought up by Eli Qiao in the code review, so he might be the
one to point us in the right direction for that.
Jaycen
-Original Messa
OK. My replies are inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Grant, Jaycen V [mailto:jaycen.v.gr...@intel.com]
> Sent: July-28-16 2:31 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Microversioning implementa
, 2016 11:10 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Microversioning implementation
Added this to the agenda of next team meeting [1].
I would like to ask clarification for " the community are discussing to using
Sem
ginal Message-
> From: Grant, Jaycen V [mailto:jaycen.v.gr...@intel.com]
> Sent: July-28-16 10:52 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Microversioning implementation
>
>
> There has been a discussion around micro ve
There has been a discussion around micro versioning implementation going on in
the following patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/343060/8 and I was asked
to bring it to the mailing list for further discussion.
Magnum added header support for microversioning according to the Openstack
spe
