vote c
it will guarantee we have s stable N release.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 3:49 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
> We have far exceeded a majority for choice C (which is my preferred choice
> as well). So once 3.0.0 tags, it is all hands on deck to make the repo
> split happen as well as get s
We have far exceeded a majority for choice C (which is my preferred choice as
well). So once 3.0.0 tags, it is all hands on deck to make the repo split
happen as well as get started on the osic documentation which we owe the OSIC
team. There were no other votes for other choices. While not ev
9:57 AM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] Splitting out Ansible into a
separate deliverable
Option C will be best, but I guess we almost have enough votes for it?:)
Option C will be best, but I guess we almost have enough votes for it?:)
I vote for C.
On 15 September 2016 at 06:45, Mauricio Lima wrote:
> Option c.
>
> 2016-09-15 8:25 GMT-03:00 Eduardo Gonzalez :
>>
>> Option C
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016, 1:23 PM Dave Walker wrote:
>>>
>>> Option C
>>>
>
Option c.
2016-09-15 8:25 GMT-03:00 Eduardo Gonzalez :
> Option C
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016, 1:23 PM Dave Walker wrote:
>
>> Option C
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> On 15 September 2016 at 12:10, Ryan Hallisey wrote:
>>
>>> Option c.
>>>
>>> - Ryan
>>>
>>> > On Sep 15, 2016, at 4:33 AM, Paul Bourke
>>> wro
Option C
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016, 1:23 PM Dave Walker wrote:
> Option C
>
> Thanks
>
> On 15 September 2016 at 12:10, Ryan Hallisey wrote:
>
>> Option c.
>>
>> - Ryan
>>
>> > On Sep 15, 2016, at 4:33 AM, Paul Bourke
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > c) Split the repository shortly after tagging 3.0.0 – c
Option C
Thanks
On 15 September 2016 at 12:10, Ryan Hallisey wrote:
> Option c.
>
> - Ryan
>
> > On Sep 15, 2016, at 4:33 AM, Paul Bourke wrote:
> >
> > c) Split the repository shortly after tagging 3.0.0 – creating a
> kolla-ansible deliverable for Ocata.
> >
> >> On 15/09/16 07:12, Ste
Option c.
- Ryan
> On Sep 15, 2016, at 4:33 AM, Paul Bourke wrote:
>
> c) Split the repository shortly after tagging 3.0.0 – creating a
> kolla-ansible deliverable for Ocata.
>
>> On 15/09/16 07:12, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
>> Core Reviewers:
>>
>>
>>
>> The facts:
>>
>> We have
c) Split the repository shortly after tagging 3.0.0 – creating a
kolla-ansible deliverable for Ocata.
On 15/09/16 07:12, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
Core Reviewers:
The facts:
We have roughly 250 bugs in rc2. Of those, I suspect over half can just
be closed out as dupes, fixed, wontf
>> a) Do not split the repository between rc1 and Summit or shortly
>> thereafter at all, keeping the Ansible implementation intact in Ocata
>> b) Split the repository shortly after tagging RC1 – creating of a
>> kolla-ansible deliverable for Ocata.
>> c) Split the repository shor
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
> Core Reviewers:
>
>
>
> The facts:
>
> We have roughly 250 bugs in rc2. Of those, I suspect over half can just be
> closed out as dupes, fixed, wontfix, or the like.
>
> The core reviewer team has had various discussions around split
> On 15 Sep 2016, at 08:12, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
>
> c) Split the repository shortly after tagging 3.0.0 – creating a
> kolla-ansible deliverable for Ocata.
+1
Christian.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Core Reviewers:
The facts:
We have roughly 250 bugs in rc2. Of those, I suspect over half can just be
closed out as dupes, fixed, wontfix, or the like.
The core reviewer team has had various discussions around splitting the
repository at various times but has not come to a concrete conclusion v
13 matches
Mail list logo
