> On Mar 21, 2016, at 2:33 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
>
>
>> On 21/03/16 17:23, "Doug Hellmann" wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 20, 2016, at 3:26 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Doug,
>>>
>>> Given that the EC2 functionality is currently in use by at least 1/6th of
>>> production clouds
>>> (htt
On 21/03/16 17:23, "Doug Hellmann" wrote:
>
>
>> On Mar 20, 2016, at 3:26 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
>>
>>
>> Doug,
>>
>> Given that the EC2 functionality is currently in use by at least 1/6th of
>> production clouds
>> (https://www.openstack.org/assets/survey/Public-User-Survey-Report.pdf page
> On Mar 20, 2016, at 3:26 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
>
>
> Doug,
>
> Given that the EC2 functionality is currently in use by at least 1/6th of
> production clouds
> (https://www.openstack.org/assets/survey/Public-User-Survey-Report.pdf page
> 34), this is a worrying situation.
I completely agre
wimmingly lately.
Best,
--Randy
From: Tim Bell [tim.b...@cern.ch]
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 12:26 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ec2-api] EC2 API Future
Doug,
Given that the EC2 functionalit
things in this area
have actually been going swimmingly lately.
Best,
--Randy
From: Tim Bell [tim.b...@cern.ch]
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 12:26 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ec2-
Doug,
Given that the EC2 functionality is currently in use by at least 1/6th of
production clouds
(https://www.openstack.org/assets/survey/Public-User-Survey-Report.pdf page
34), this is a worrying situation.
The EC2 functionality was recently deprecated from Nova on the grounds that the
EC2
