Thanks for your advice.
On Thursday, October 16, 2014 2:25 AM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> I don't know if the bug report is all that necessary or useful.
> The scope of the problem is well defined without, IMHO.
I really want to have clear rules for this but your thought looks
pretty nice for me (go
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 04:56:55 +
"Osanai, Hisashi" wrote:
> Today the following patch was abandoned and I contacted with the author,
> so I would like to take it over if nobody else is chafing to take it.
> Is it OK?
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/80421/
>
> If it is OK, I will proceed
Hi Matthew,
Thanks for the quick response.
On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 2:31 PM, Matthew Oliver wrote:
> - Continue where this one left off, in which case pull down the change from
> gerrit
> and start working on it. But if you do this make sure you add a
> 'Co-Authored-By: name
> ' to att
Hey Hisashi ,
It does indeed look abandoned. So if you want to take it over sure that's
OK :)
1) It isn't a bug, so no bug report is needed. You could raise a BP if you
wanted, jump on the freenode #openstack-swift channel if you want to
discuss.
2) You can do one of two things:
- Continue whe
rg
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [swift] Allow hostname for nodes in Ring
>
>
> Hi Swift folks,
>
> Today the following patch was abandoned and I contacted with the author,
> so I would like to take it over if nobody else is chafing to take it.
> Is it OK?
>
> https://review.op
Hi Swift folks,
Today the following patch was abandoned and I contacted with the author,
so I would like to take it over if nobody else is chafing to take it.
Is it OK?
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/80421/
If it is OK, I will proceed it with following procedure.
(1) Open new bug report (the
