Julien,
Right. the idea is to expand where we use etcd in openstack for other
things as well. example the os-lively effort from Jay, another one is
the oslo.config calling etcd3 fetch config entries.
Thanks,
Dims
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30 2017, Davan
On Thu, Mar 30 2017, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Julien,
>
> Yes, Jay is adding this driver for "etcd3://" using the
> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/etcd3 library
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447223/
>
> and i'll followup with a "etcd3+http://"; driver using the
> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/e
Julien,
Yes, Jay is adding this driver for "etcd3://" using the
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/etcd3 library
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447223/
and i'll followup with a "etcd3+http://"; driver using the
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/etcd3gw library
Thanks,
Dims
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 12:51
On Thu, Mar 30 2017, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Update.. So i just proposed a new library built off the [3] gist to be
> added to g-r and u-c.
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/450967/
>
> The alternative was to add support for custom backends in etcd3
> library itself with grpc and v3alpha HTTP
Update.. So i just proposed a new library built off the [3] gist to be
added to g-r and u-c.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/450967/
The alternative was to add support for custom backends in etcd3
library itself with grpc and v3alpha HTTP API as implementations.
Since tooz is already an abstract
Also, I gave a stab at an etcd3 tooz coordination driver:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447223/
Can't figure out how to get the tests to run properly, but meh, I'll get
to it in a bit :)
-jay
On 03/19/2017 04:34 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Quick update: We have 3 options to talk to etcd:
Quick update: We have 3 options to talk to etcd:
1) existing V2 HTTP API - still not deprecated in etcd 3.1.x, so
existing code in tooz still works.
2) grpc based V3 API - We can use the etcd3 package, discussion in
review[1], problem is that this will not work currently with eventlet
based servic
On 03/18/2017 07:48 PM, Mike Perez wrote:
On 12:35 Mar 14, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 03/14/2017 08:57 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14 2017, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Let's do it!! (etcd v2-v3 in tooz)
Hehe. I'll move that higher in my priority list, I swear. But anyone is
free to beat me to
On 12:35 Mar 14, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 03/14/2017 08:57 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 14 2017, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> >
> >>Let's do it!! (etcd v2-v3 in tooz)
> >
> >Hehe. I'll move that higher in my priority list, I swear. But anyone is
> >free to beat me to it in the meantime. ;)
>
On 16:37 Mar 18, Mike Perez wrote:
> On 16:02 Mar 15, Monty Taylor wrote:
> > On 03/15/2017 02:52 PM, Louis Taylor wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Mar 15 2017, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Yep, jd__ and i confirmed that things work with 3
On 16:02 Mar 15, Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 03/15/2017 02:52 PM, Louis Taylor wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 15 2017, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yep, jd__ and i confirmed that things work with 3.x
> >>
> >> Though to be clear, what's used in
Excerpts from Clark Boylan's message of 2017-03-15 09:50:49 -0700:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017, at 06:19 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> > On 03/15/2017 11:37 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > > Monty, Team,
> > >
> > > Sorry for the top post:
> > >
> > > Support for etcd/tooz in devstack (with file driver as
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017, at 06:19 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 03/15/2017 11:37 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > Monty, Team,
> >
> > Sorry for the top post:
> >
> > Support for etcd/tooz in devstack (with file driver as default) -
> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445432/
> >
> > As of right now
On Wed, Mar 15 2017, Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 03/15/2017 02:44 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 15 2017, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>>
>>> Yep, jd__ and i confirmed that things work with 3.x
>>
>> Though to be clear, what's used in tooz is the v2 HTTP API, not the new
>> v3 gRPC API.
>
> But
On 03/15/2017 02:52 PM, Louis Taylor wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 15 2017, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>>
>>> Yep, jd__ and i confirmed that things work with 3.x
>>
>> Though to be clear, what's used in tooz is the v2 HTTP API, not the new
>> v3 gRPC AP
On 03/15/2017 02:44 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15 2017, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
>> Yep, jd__ and i confirmed that things work with 3.x
>
> Though to be clear, what's used in tooz is the v2 HTTP API, not the new
> v3 gRPC API.
But if it conceptually works with v3 server using v2 htt
On 03/15/2017 02:26 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>> On 03/15/2017 11:37 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>>> Monty, Team,
>>>
>>> Sorry for the top post:
>>>
>>> Support for etcd/tooz in devstack (with file driver as default) -
>>> https://review.op
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15 2017, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
>> Yep, jd__ and i confirmed that things work with 3.x
>
> Though to be clear, what's used in tooz is the v2 HTTP API, not the new
> v3 gRPC API.
And just to be double clear: although etcd 3.x c
On Wed, Mar 15 2017, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Yep, jd__ and i confirmed that things work with 3.x
Though to be clear, what's used in tooz is the v2 HTTP API, not the new
v3 gRPC API.
--
Julien Danjou
# Free Software hacker
# https://julien.danjou.info
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 03/15/2017 11:37 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>> Monty, Team,
>>
>> Sorry for the top post:
>>
>> Support for etcd/tooz in devstack (with file driver as default) -
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445432/
>>
>> As of right now both zookee
On 03/15/2017 01:48 PM, John Garbutt wrote:
> On 15 March 2017 at 12:33, Sean Dague wrote:
>> On 03/15/2017 08:10 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
>>> On 15 March 2017 at 11:58, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 03/15/2017 07:44 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
>
> On 03/14/2017 11:00 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>
>
On 03/15/2017 11:37 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Monty, Team,
>
> Sorry for the top post:
>
> Support for etcd/tooz in devstack (with file driver as default) -
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445432/
>
> As of right now both zookeeper driver and etcd driver is working fine:
> https://review.
On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 08:33 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 03/15/2017 08:10 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
> > On 15 March 2017 at 11:58, Jay Pipes wrote:
> > > On 03/15/2017 07:44 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 03/14/2017 11:00 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > a) awesome.
On 15 March 2017 at 12:33, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 03/15/2017 08:10 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
>> On 15 March 2017 at 11:58, Jay Pipes wrote:
>>> On 03/15/2017 07:44 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/14/2017 11:00 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>
> a) awesome. when the rest of this dips mo
On 03/15/2017 08:10 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
> On 15 March 2017 at 11:58, Jay Pipes wrote:
>> On 03/15/2017 07:44 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/14/2017 11:00 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>>>
a) awesome. when the rest of this dips momentarily into words that might
sound negative, pl
On 15 March 2017 at 11:58, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 03/15/2017 07:44 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
>>
>> On 03/14/2017 11:00 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> a) awesome. when the rest of this dips momentarily into words that might
>>> sound negative, please hear it all wrapped in an "awesome" and know tha
On 03/15/2017 07:44 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/14/2017 11:00 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
a) awesome. when the rest of this dips momentarily into words that might
sound negative, please hear it all wrapped in an "awesome" and know that
my personal desire is to see the thing you're working on be suc
+1000 Sean.
Thanks,
Dims
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 03/14/2017 11:00 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>
>> a) awesome. when the rest of this dips momentarily into words that might
>> sound negative, please hear it all wrapped in an "awesome" and know that
>> my personal desi
On 03/14/2017 11:00 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> a) awesome. when the rest of this dips momentarily into words that might
> sound negative, please hear it all wrapped in an "awesome" and know that
> my personal desire is to see the thing you're working on be successful
> without undue burden...
>
>
Monty, Team,
Sorry for the top post:
Support for etcd/tooz in devstack (with file driver as default) -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445432/
As of right now both zookeeper driver and etcd driver is working fine:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445630/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445629/
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2017-03-14 22:13:32 -0400:
> On 03/14/2017 05:01 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2017-03-14 15:30:32 -0400:
> >> On 03/14/2017 02:50 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Mar 14 2017, Jay Pipes wrote:
> >>>
> Not tooz, becau
On 03/15/2017 03:13 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 03/14/2017 05:01 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>> Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2017-03-14 15:30:32 -0400:
>>> On 03/14/2017 02:50 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14 2017, Jay Pipes wrote:
> Not tooz, because I'm not interested in a D
On 03/14/2017 05:01 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2017-03-14 15:30:32 -0400:
On 03/14/2017 02:50 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14 2017, Jay Pipes wrote:
Not tooz, because I'm not interested in a DLM nor leader election library
(that's what the underlying e
On Tue, Mar 14 2017, Clint Byrum wrote:
> I understand abstractions can seem pretty cumbersome when you're moving
> fast.
Considering the problem is at least 5 years old in Nova and tooz itself
is at least 3 years old, let's say that "moving fast" has a… funny
taste.
> It's not something I want
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2017-03-14 15:30:32 -0400:
> On 03/14/2017 02:50 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14 2017, Jay Pipes wrote:
> >
> >> Not tooz, because I'm not interested in a DLM nor leader election library
> >> (that's what the underlying etcd3 cluster handles for me),
On 03/14/2017 04:22 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Jay Pipes wrote:
On 03/14/2017 02:50 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14 2017, Jay Pipes wrote:
Not tooz, because I'm not interested in a DLM nor leader election
library
(that's what the underlying etcd3 cluster handles for me), only a
fast ser
Jay Pipes wrote:
On 03/14/2017 02:50 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14 2017, Jay Pipes wrote:
Not tooz, because I'm not interested in a DLM nor leader election
library
(that's what the underlying etcd3 cluster handles for me), only a
fast service
liveness/healthcheck system, but it shows
On 03/14/2017 02:50 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14 2017, Jay Pipes wrote:
Not tooz, because I'm not interested in a DLM nor leader election library
(that's what the underlying etcd3 cluster handles for me), only a fast service
liveness/healthcheck system, but it shows usage of etcd3 an
On Tue, Mar 14 2017, Jay Pipes wrote:
> Not tooz, because I'm not interested in a DLM nor leader election library
> (that's what the underlying etcd3 cluster handles for me), only a fast service
> liveness/healthcheck system, but it shows usage of etcd3 and Google Protocol
> Buffers implementing a
+1
From: Thierry Carrez [thie...@openstack.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 3:00 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][devstack][all] ZooKeeper vs etcd for
Tooz/DLM
Fox, Kevin M wrote:
> With my operator hat on
On 03/14/2017 08:57 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14 2017, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Let's do it!! (etcd v2-v3 in tooz)
Hehe. I'll move that higher in my priority list, I swear. But anyone is
free to beat me to it in the meantime. ;)
A weekend experiment:
https://github.com/jaypipes/o
Etcd seems to be a better choice for performance reasons as well:
https://coreos.com/blog/performance-of-etcd.html
TP
On 14 Mar 2017 12:45 am, "Davanum Srinivas" wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14 2017, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
> > Let's do it!! (etcd v2-v3 in tooz)
>
> Hehe. I'll move that higher in my
On Tue, Mar 14 2017, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Let's do it!! (etcd v2-v3 in tooz)
Hehe. I'll move that higher in my priority list, I swear. But anyone is
free to beat me to it in the meantime. ;)
--
Julien Danjou
-- Free Software hacker
-- https://julien.danjou.info
signature.asc
Description:
Julien,
Let's do it!! (etcd v2-v3 in tooz)
Thanks,
Dims
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 5:24 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13 2017, Joshua Harlow wrote:
>
>> Etcd I think is also switching to grpc sometime in the future (afaik); that
>> feature is in alpha/?beta?/experimental right now.
>
> Ye
Fox, Kevin M wrote:
> With my operator hat on, I would like to use the etcd backend, as I'm already
> paying the cost of maintaining etcd clusters as part of Kubernetes. Adding
> Zookeeper is a lot more work.
+1
In the spirit of better operationally integrating with Kubernetes, I
think we need
On Mon, Mar 13 2017, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> Etcd I think is also switching to grpc sometime in the future (afaik); that
> feature is in alpha/?beta?/experimental right now.
Yeah I think that's the main "problem" in tooz right now, it's that we
still rely on etcd v2 and I think v3 is out with that
Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2017-03-14 00:09:55 +:
With my operator hat on, I would like to use the etcd backend, as I'm already
paying the cost of maintaining etcd clusters as part of Kubernetes. Adding
Zookeeper is a lot more work.
It would probably be
Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2017-03-14 00:09:55 +:
> With my operator hat on, I would like to use the etcd backend, as I'm already
> paying the cost of maintaining etcd clusters as part of Kubernetes. Adding
> Zookeeper is a lot more work.
>
It would probably be a good idea to p
onday, March 13, 2017 4:42 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [oslo][devstack][all] ZooKeeper vs etcd for Tooz/DLM
Folks,
Currently devstack defaults to zookeeper and is opinionated about it.
Talking to Josh, etcd seems to be a good optio
Folks,
Currently devstack defaults to zookeeper and is opinionated about it.
Talking to Josh, etcd seems to be a good option too.
Does anyone have specific experience with etcd with tooz?
Do we want to make DLM mandatory? (always run with tooz + backend)?
Asking because lots of the container rel
50 matches
Mail list logo
