LOL. thanks jd__ :)
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06 2014, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
>> The main reasons for splitting code into its own library are dependency
>> management, API ownership, the logical separation of the contents of the
>> library
>> within the
On Thu, Nov 06 2014, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> The main reasons for splitting code into its own library are dependency
> management, API ownership, the logical separation of the contents of the
> library
> within the application stack and between other libraries, and review ACLs
> within
> gerrit.
On Nov 6, 2014, at 11:13 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05 2014, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
>> Please see notes from Doug on the etherpad on why leaving it in
>> oslo.log or oslo.utils was not considered.
>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-oslo-library-proposals
>
> I only get tha
jd__,
No sweat, we can talk in the next oslo weekly meeting
-- dims
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05 2014, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
>> Please see notes from Doug on the etherpad on why leaving it in
>> oslo.log or oslo.utils was not considered.
>> https://
On Wed, Nov 05 2014, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Please see notes from Doug on the etherpad on why leaving it in
> oslo.log or oslo.utils was not considered.
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-oslo-library-proposals
I only get that it might be related to db at some point, but I only
skimmed th
jd__,
No issues. I followed the process in the wiki for creating a library
with minimal changes required to get the test running as documented.
we can do some of these in the openstack git when the project gets
created.
Please see notes from Doug on the etherpad on why leaving it in
oslo.log or o
On Wed, Nov 05 2014, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Sorry I missed the session (had a talk at that time).
> At the Design Summit session for Oslo Library Graduation for Kilo, we
> decided that oslo.context was a high priority item since oslo.log was
> blocked. So here's a git repo [2], please take a loo
FWIW, this looks good to me - looking forward to using it in
keystonemiddleware
Steve
From: Davanum Srinivas
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 11/05/2014 09:46 AM
Subject:[openstack-dev] [oslo][context] oslo.context repository
review request
Hello all,
At the
Hello all,
At the Design Summit session for Oslo Library Graduation for Kilo, we
decided that oslo.context was a high priority item since oslo.log was
blocked. So here's a git repo [2], please take a look to see if this
is good enough for us to open up a infra request.
thanks,
dims
[1] https://e
