On 9/21/2014 7:56 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 9/10/2014 3:33 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 09/10/2014 02:13 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
As it stands, it seems that waiting for the RPC call to time out
blocks _report_state() from running again in report_interval seconds,
which delays the servic
On 9/10/2014 3:33 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 09/10/2014 02:13 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
As it stands, it seems that waiting for the RPC call to time out
blocks _report_state() from running again in report_interval seconds,
which delays the service update until the RPC timeout period expires.
On 09/10/2014 02:13 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
As it stands, it seems that waiting for the RPC call to time out blocks
_report_state() from running again in report_interval seconds, which delays the
service update until the RPC timeout period expires.
Just noticed something...
In the case of
Hi,
I'm running Havana and I'm seeing some less-than-ideal behaviour on rabbitmq
failover. I'd like to figure out if this is expected behaviour or if something
is going wrong.
We're running rabbitmq in active/standby mode with DRBD storage. On the
controller the timeline looks like this:
07