lzy@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>> So, this is a significant feature... which paradoxically is a good
>> reason to accept it *and* to deny it. On one hand it would be nice to
>> complete this (with Glance support for it being landed), but on the
>>
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> lzy@gmail.com wrote:
>> BP: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/image-multiple-location
>>
>> Since a dependent patch getting merger delay
>> (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/44316/), so the main patch
>> https://review.openstac
On 09/12/2013 09:43 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> lzy@gmail.com wrote:
>> BP: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/image-multiple-location
>>
>> Since a dependent patch getting merger delay
>> (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/44316/), so the main patch
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/
lzy@gmail.com wrote:
> BP: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/image-multiple-location
>
> Since a dependent patch getting merger delay
> (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/44316/), so the main patch
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/33409/ been hold by FF. It's very
> close to get mer
Folks,
BP: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/image-multiple-location
Since a dependent patch getting merger delay
(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/44316/), so the main patch
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/33409/ been hold by FF. It's very
close to get merger and waited about 3 months
