locking.
>
>Vui
>
>
>- Original Message -
>| From: "Matthew Booth"
>| To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>
>| Sent: Friday, March 7, 2014 8:53:26 AM
>| Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova][vmware] Locking: A can of worms
ent: Friday, March 7, 2014 8:53:26 AM
| Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova][vmware] Locking: A can of worms
|
| We need locking in the VMware driver. There are 2 questions:
|
| 1. How much locking do we need?
| 2. Do we need single-node or multi-node locking?
|
| I believe these are quite separate iss
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/stackforge/tooz
This is good stuff. The only solution I could come up with for image
cache management was to have yet another service that you would set up
to manage the shared image cache resource. The current
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Matthew Booth wrote:
> We need locking in the VMware driver. There are 2 questions:
>
> 1. How much locking do we need?
> 2. Do we need single-node or multi-node locking?
>
> I believe these are quite separate issues, so I'm going to try not to
> confuse them. I'm
s)"
Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova][vmware] Locking: A can of worms
>We need locking in the VMware driver. There are 2 questions:
>
>1. How much locking do we need?
>2. Do we need single-node or multi-node locking?
>
>I believe these are quite separate issues, so I'm goin
We need locking in the VMware driver. There are 2 questions:
1. How much locking do we need?
2. Do we need single-node or multi-node locking?
I believe these are quite separate issues, so I'm going to try not to
confuse them. I'm going to deal with the first question first.
In reviewing the imag