://review.openstack.org/#/c/112947/
From: huangdenghui [hdh_1...@163.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2015 4:09 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][L3][DVR][arp]
If those 200 subnets are VXLAN
: Sunday, November 29, 2015 4:09 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][L3][DVR][arp]
If those 200 subnets are VXLAN networks, i think it is a good idea, since
L2population already propagate this configuration to OVS-Agent.
One
If those 200 subnets are VXLAN networks, i think it is a good idea, since
L2population already propagate this configuration to OVS-Agent.
One comment for VLAN network, since DVR also support in VLAN network and
L2population is not necessary in it, what is your consideration in this case?
Is it a good idea to add a configuration item for dvr, to disable any arp entry
processing, and reuse arp response from L2population?
When no static arp entry is found in qrouter namespace, it would cause a temp
arp request, then it reached the br-tun, and replied by the OVS flow table.
In a pu
