Thanks for the reminder, Michal.
I sent the email here because the client library is dependency of several
openstack projects, the issue I found may cause potential problems to them,
and I also want to get some hints if they already solved that.
Cheers,
Lingxian Kong (Larry)
On Thu, Jan 11, 201
On 01/10/2018 07:40 AM, Lingxian Kong wrote:
> I submitted an issue in github[1] the other day but didn't get any
> response, try my luck to attract attention here in case someone else has
> the same problem or already has a solution I didn't know, or hopefully, I
> missed something.
>
This is no
I submitted an issue in github[1] the other day but didn't get any
response, try my luck to attract attention here in case someone else has
the same problem or already has a solution I didn't know, or hopefully, I
missed something.
The problem is when I want to get service list(the result should b
Hello everyone,
I'm pleased to announce that the event schedule is published - you may find
it at the event page [1].
Please, join us on May 9 at OpenStack Summit venue in Boston!
Ihor
1. https://www.cncf.io/event/openstack-north-america-2017
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:44 AM, Ihor Dvoretskyi
- Original Message -
> From: "Monty Taylor"
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Sent: Sunday, April 2, 2017 4:16:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud
> Provider for Kubernetes
>
> On 04/02/2017 02:53 PM, Chr
> >>> To: "Chris Hoge"
> >>> Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> >>> ,
> >>> "kubernetes-sig-openstack"
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 2:28:29 PM
> >>>
ist (not for usage questions)"
>>> ,
>>> "kubernetes-sig-openstack"
>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 2:28:29 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud
>>> Provider for Kubernetes
>>>
>>
> On Apr 2, 2017, at 4:16 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>
> On 04/02/2017 02:53 PM, Chris Hoge wrote:
>> Now that the provider has a repository in the OpenStack project
>> namespace, we need to move over the existing set of issues and pull
>> requests and create an initial work list for migrating patc
stack"
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 2:28:29 PM
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud
>> Provider for Kubernetes
>>
>> Team,
>>
>> Repo is ready:
>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/k8s-cloud-pr
On 04/02/2017 02:53 PM, Chris Hoge wrote:
> Now that the provider has a repository in the OpenStack project
> namespace, we need to move over the existing set of issues and pull
> requests and create an initial work list for migrating patches and
> fixing existing issues.
>
> I've started up an et
Now that the provider has a repository in the OpenStack project
namespace, we need to move over the existing set of issues and pull
requests and create an initial work list for migrating patches and
fixing existing issues.
I've started up an etherpad where we can track that work[1]. In the longer
- Original Message -
> From: "Davanum Srinivas"
> To: "Chris Hoge"
> Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> ,
> "kubernetes-sig-openstack"
> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 2:28:29 PM
> Subject:
Team,
Repo is ready:
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/k8s-cloud-provider
I've taken the liberty of updating it with the latest changes in the
kubernetes/kubernetes repo:
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/k8s-cloud-provider is ready
So logical next step would be to add CI
On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 8:46:42 AM UTC-7, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 3:59:18 PM UTC+1, Graham Hayes wrote:
>>
>> On 24/03/17 10:27 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>> >Folks,
>> >
>> >As discussed in the etherpad:
>> >https://etherpad.openstack.org/p
On 03/24/2017 11:22 AM, Graham Hayes wrote:
> On 24/03/17 08:46 -0700, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 3:59:18 PM UTC+1, Graham Hayes wrote:
>>
>>On 24/03/17 10:27 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>>>Folks,
>>>
>>>As discussed in the etherpad:
>>
On 24/03/17 08:46 -0700, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote:
On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 3:59:18 PM UTC+1, Graham Hayes wrote:
On 24/03/17 10:27 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>Folks,
>
>As discussed in the etherpad:
>https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/go-and-containers
>
>Here's
On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 3:59:18 PM UTC+1, Graham Hayes wrote:
>
> On 24/03/17 10:27 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> >Folks,
> >
> >As discussed in the etherpad:
> >https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/go-and-containers
> >
> >Here's a request for a repo in OpenStack:
> >https://review.op
On 24/03/17 10:27 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Folks,
As discussed in the etherpad:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/go-and-containers
Here's a request for a repo in OpenStack:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/449641/
This request pulls in the existing code from kubernetes/kubernetes
repo an
Folks,
As discussed in the etherpad:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/go-and-containers
Here's a request for a repo in OpenStack:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/449641/
This request pulls in the existing code from kubernetes/kubernetes
repo and preserves the git history too
https://github.com/
Hello everyone,
On behalf of Kubernetes Community and OpenStack SpeciaI Interest Group [0],
I'm happy to announce Kubernetes Day at OpenStack Summit NA 2017. The event
will be hosted by CNCF as a part of OpenStack’s Open Source Days in Boston
[1].
The CFP process is already open - feel free to su
ot;Kevin M Fox"
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 11:41:12 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes]
Two issues I can see with that approach.
1. It needs to be incredibly well documented as well as tools provided
of a bind.
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Ryan Hallisey [rhall...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 5:20 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes]
Thanks for the feedback Kevin.
The community has been in
Stack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 11:37:33 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes]
+1 for using k8s to do work where possible.
-1 for trying to shoehorn a feature in so that k8s can deal with stuff its not
ready to handle. We need to en
+1 for using k8s to do work where possible.
-1 for trying to shoehorn a feature in so that k8s can deal with stuff its not
ready to handle. We need to ensure Operators have everything they need in order
to successfully operate their cloud.
The current upgrade stuff in k8s is focused around repl
got it thanks :)
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 10:52 PM, Steve Gordon wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Zhipeng Huang"
> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> >
> > Hi Ihor,
> >
> > This is a great news ! As a matt
- Original Message -
> From: "Zhipeng Huang"
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>
>
> Hi Ihor,
>
> This is a great news ! As a matter of fact at the moment the Tricircle team
> from OpenStack is working with Ubernetes team lead by Quinton to explore
>
Hi Ihor,
This is a great news ! As a matter of fact at the moment the Tricircle team
from OpenStack is working with Ubernetes team lead by Quinton to explore
features about how OpenStack federation could help K8s federation works
better. This SIG seems like a good fit for our ongoing work.
Will y
Colleagues, I'm happy to announce within the OpenStack community the
Kubernetes OpenStack Special Interest Group.
Kubernetes Community currently runs to the deeper integration between
OpenStack and Kubernetes and one of the main aims now - to work on enabling
OpenStack as a platform for running Ku
28 matches
Mail list logo
