On 01/11/2016 03:49 PM, Serge Kovaleff wrote:
Hi All,
Last week I had a noble goal to write "one-more" functional test in Ironic.
I did find a folder "func" but it was empty.
Friends helped me to find a WIP patch
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/235612/
and here comes the question of this emai
]
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 10:42 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][tests] approach to functional/integration
tests
I personally like Option #1 as an additional goal is to make it easy for
developers to also run the
We might want to implement all three options. The more tests the better :)
Cheers,
Serge Kovaleff
http://www.mirantis.com
cell: +38 (063) 83-155-70
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 5:41 PM, John Villalovos wrote:
> I personally like Option #1 as an additional goal is to make it easy for
> developers to
I personally like Option #1 as an additional goal is to make it easy for
developers to also run the functional tests with 'tox -efunctional'. And
also run the functional tests as part of a normal tox run.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Serge Kovaleff
wrote:
> Option 3 - to concentrate on Temp
Option 3 - to concentrate on Tempest tests
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/253982/
Cheers,
Serge Kovaleff
http://www.mirantis.com
cell: +38 (063) 83-155-70
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Serge Kovaleff
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Last week I had a noble goal to write "one-more" functional test in I
Hi All,
Last week I had a noble goal to write "one-more" functional test in Ironic.
I did find a folder "func" but it was empty.
Friends helped me to find a WIP patch
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/235612/
and here comes the question of this email: what approach we would like to
implement:
Opt
