Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] elements vs. openstack-infra puppet for CI "infra" nodes

2014-05-09 Thread Elizabeth K. Joseph
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 5:51 AM, Dan Prince wrote: > I originally sent this to TripleO but perhaps [infra] would have been a > better choice. Adding the -infra mailing list on this too so folks see it as they rush around doing pre-summit things. > The short version is I'd like to run a lightweig

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] elements vs. openstack-infra puppet for CI "infra" nodes

2014-05-05 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Dan Prince's message of 2014-05-05 05:51:52 -0700: > I originally sent this to TripleO but perhaps [infra] would have been a > better choice. > > The short version is I'd like to run a lightweight (unofficial) mirror for > Fedora in infra: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/908

[openstack-dev] [infra] elements vs. openstack-infra puppet for CI "infra" nodes

2014-05-05 Thread Dan Prince
I originally sent this to TripleO but perhaps [infra] would have been a better choice. The short version is I'd like to run a lightweight (unofficial) mirror for Fedora in infra: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90875/ And then in the TripleO CI racks we can run local Squid caches using somet