Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker] dockenstack updated for nova-docker stackforge repo

2014-04-17 21:30 GMT+02:00 Eric Windisch : > > Furthermore, I've started testing KVM/Qemu support. It's looking > promising. It's too early to claim it's supported, but I've only ran into > minor issues so far. I'll update again when I've made further progress. > Also pending, but not far away, i

[openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker] dockenstack updated for nova-docker stackforge repo

For those following the dockenstack work, just giving an update that it has finally been updated to work with the nova-docker stackforge repository. The new image is now available on the docker index and may be fetched with 'docker pull ewindisch/dockenstack'. Usage instructions are available in th

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

Hi Eric, 2014-04-16 21:06 GMT+02:00 Eric Windisch : > >> > As I really would like to keep a 1:1 matching with my current Devstack >> > installation, have you tried to trick Dockenstack by modifying the >> > localrc file to say Qemu as the driver ? >> > > Not yet, but I'd like to. It has been a s

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

On 04/16/2014 03:06 PM, Eric Windisch wrote: > > > As I really would like to keep a 1:1 matching with my current Devstack > > installation, have you tried to trick Dockenstack by modifying the > > localrc file to say Qemu as the driver ? > > > Not yet, but I'd like to. It has been a

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

> > > > As I really would like to keep a 1:1 matching with my current Devstack > > installation, have you tried to trick Dockenstack by modifying the > > localrc file to say Qemu as the driver ? > Not yet, but I'd like to. It has been a secondary goal at this point. I have successfully tested with

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

On 12/04/14 04:45, Eric Windisch wrote: > > Any disagreements with that goal? > > > No disagreement at all. > > Not that we're talking yet about moving the driver back into Nova, I'd > like to take this opportunity to remind anyone interesting in > contributing a Cinder driver that it would

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

On 13/04/14 01:49, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 04/12/2014 02:27 PM, James E. Blair wrote: >> Michael Still writes: >> >>> Agreed, where it makes sense. In general we should be avoiding third >>> party CI unless we need to support something we can't in the gate -- a >>> proprietary virt driver, or w

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

On 11/04/14 21:03, Paul Czarkowski wrote: > Based on this feedback I have removed the docker portions of the review to > devstack > But have kept in the changes that make it easier for a nova drivers to add > their own > Files to the nova rootwrap.d directory. sounds good, I'll give it a go and upd

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

On 04/12/2014 03:24 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: > Hi Eric, > > > 2014-04-12 5:45 GMT+02:00 Eric Windisch >: > > > > > > > As for dockenstack, this might deserve a separate thread. What I've > done here is build something that may be useful to opensta

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

On 04/12/2014 02:27 PM, James E. Blair wrote: > Michael Still writes: > >> Agreed, where it makes sense. In general we should be avoiding third >> party CI unless we need to support something we can't in the gate -- a >> proprietary virt driver, or weird network hardware for example. I >> think w

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

Hi Eric, 2014-04-12 5:45 GMT+02:00 Eric Windisch : > > > As for dockenstack, this might deserve a separate thread. What I've done > here is build something that may be useful to openstack-infra and might > necessitate further discussion. It's the fastest way to get the Docker > driver up and

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

Michael Still writes: > Agreed, where it makes sense. In general we should be avoiding third > party CI unless we need to support something we can't in the gate -- a > proprietary virt driver, or weird network hardware for example. I > think we've now well and truly demonstrated that third party

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

> > > Any disagreements with that goal? > No disagreement at all. Not that we're talking yet about moving the driver back into Nova, I'd like to take this opportunity to remind anyone interesting in contributing a Cinder driver that it would be a lot easier if they do it while the driver is still

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 04/11/2014 04:58 PM, Sean Dague wrote: [snip] >> If we think it's staying in 3rd party, people are free to use >> whatever they would like. > > I guess we should be clear on this point. > > I *really* think the best way forward is to mo

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

On 04/11/2014 04:58 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 04/11/2014 04:39 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: >> On 04/11/2014 04:29 PM, Eric Windisch wrote: >>> >>> What I hope to do is setup a check doing CI on devstack-f20 >>> nodes[3], this will setup a devstack based nova with the >>> nova-docker driver and can

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

On 04/11/2014 04:39 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 04/11/2014 04:29 PM, Eric Windisch wrote: >> >> What I hope to do is setup a check doing CI on devstack-f20 nodes[3], >> this will setup a devstack based nova with the nova-docker driver and >> can then run what ever tests make sense (c

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

On 04/11/2014 04:29 PM, Eric Windisch wrote: > > What I hope to do is setup a check doing CI on devstack-f20 nodes[3], > this will setup a devstack based nova with the nova-docker driver and > can then run what ever tests make sense (currently only a minimal test, > Eric I believe

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

> > > What I hope to do is setup a check doing CI on devstack-f20 nodes[3], > this will setup a devstack based nova with the nova-docker driver and > can then run what ever tests make sense (currently only a minimal test, > Eric I believe you were looking at tempest support maybe it could be > hook

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

Based on this feedback I have removed the docker portions of the review to devstack But have kept in the changes that make it easier for a nova drivers to add their own Files to the nova rootwrap.d directory. On 4/11/14 10:47 AM, "Russell Bryant" wrote: >On 04/11/2014 11:28 AM, Paul Czarkowski w

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

On 04/11/2014 11:50 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: > On 11/04/14 16:28, Paul Czarkowski wrote: >> I would rather see the devstack support be integrated in devstack's repo >> itself. There's a review >> Outstanding for devstack[1] that adds this support in and also adds in >> some pieces to make >> it e

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

On 11/04/14 16:28, Paul Czarkowski wrote: > I would rather see the devstack support be integrated in devstack's repo > itself. There's a review > Outstanding for devstack[1] that adds this support in and also adds in > some pieces to make > it easier to utilize external nova drivers. Great, I ha

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

On 04/11/2014 11:28 AM, Paul Czarkowski wrote: > I would rather see the devstack support be integrated in devstack's repo > itself. There's a review > Outstanding for devstack[1] that adds this support in and also adds in > some pieces to make > it easier to utilize external nova drivers. > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

I would rather see the devstack support be integrated in devstack's repo itself. There's a review Outstanding for devstack[1] that adds this support in and also adds in some pieces to make it easier to utilize external nova drivers. If that fails out then I'm all for merging in your review to t

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

On 04/11/2014 10:11 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: > Hi All, > > I've been taking a look at devstack support for nova-docker[1] which > was recently taken out of nova. I stumbled across a similar effort > currently underway[2], so have based my work off that. > > What I hope to do is setup a check

[openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

Hi All, I've been taking a look at devstack support for nova-docker[1] which was recently taken out of nova. I stumbled across a similar effort currently underway[2], so have based my work off that. What I hope to do is setup a check doing CI on devstack-f20 nodes[3], this will setup a devsta