Dmitry
I apologize - I did not notice that the commit depends on other ones to
Fuel Library which actually improve unit tests coverage. Disregard my
previous message, please.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Vladimir Kuklin
wrote:
> Dmitry
>
> These are awesome news.
>
> BTW, why should we en
Dmitry
These are awesome news.
BTW, why should we enable unit tests for Fuel Library in voting mode right
now? It seems not all our modules have them passing. Can we wait a bit and
recheck it or we will get our master merges blocked?
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 3:25 AM, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
>
Back in July, I proposed a plan to implement PTI in Fuel [0] during Fuel
8.0 development cycle, with the following mandatory stages:
Stage 1: Create non-voting gate jobs for a single Fuel repo.
Stage 2: Get these gate jobs to pass and make them voting.
Stage 3: Create non-voting gate jobs for all
