On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Adriano Petrich wrote:
> Amazing! Thanks for the effort that took to get the promotion fixed!
>
> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Jason E. Rist wrote:
>
>> On 11/03/2017 03:52 AM, Gabriele Cerami wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > since the failures in Tuesday's tests were
Amazing! Thanks for the effort that took to get the promotion fixed!
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Jason E. Rist wrote:
> On 11/03/2017 03:52 AM, Gabriele Cerami wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > since the failures in Tuesday's tests were caused by infra problems, we
> > believed a specific hash involved
On 11/03/2017 03:52 AM, Gabriele Cerami wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since the failures in Tuesday's tests were caused by infra problems, we
> believed a specific hash involved in the failures to remain the best
> candidate for a promotion.
> So we pinned it in our promotion pipeline and insisted on it for som
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 5:52 AM, Gabriele Cerami wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since the failures in Tuesday's tests were caused by infra problems, we
> believed a specific hash involved in the failures to remain the best
> candidate for a promotion.
> So we pinned it in our promotion pipeline and insisted on
Hi,
since the failures in Tuesday's tests were caused by infra problems, we
believed a specific hash involved in the failures to remain the best
candidate for a promotion.
So we pinned it in our promotion pipeline and insisted on it for some
hours. It has passed all the tests twice, so we dacided
