On 10/13/2015 08:08 PM, Dan Prince wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 11:38 -0500, Ben Nemec wrote:
>> On 10/10/2015 08:12 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>>> On 2015-10-09 17:10:15 -0500 (-0500), Ben Nemec wrote:
As discussed in the meeting a week or two ago, we would like to
bring
back the a
On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 11:38 -0500, Ben Nemec wrote:
> On 10/10/2015 08:12 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> > On 2015-10-09 17:10:15 -0500 (-0500), Ben Nemec wrote:
> > > As discussed in the meeting a week or two ago, we would like to
> > > bring
> > > back the auto-abandon functionality for old, unloved
On 10/10/2015 08:12 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2015-10-09 17:10:15 -0500 (-0500), Ben Nemec wrote:
>> As discussed in the meeting a week or two ago, we would like to bring
>> back the auto-abandon functionality for old, unloved gerrit reviews.
> [...]
>> -WIP patches are never abandoned
> [...]
On 10/10/15 01:10, Ben Nemec wrote:
> Hi OoOers,
>
> As discussed in the meeting a week or two ago, we would like to bring
> back the auto-abandon functionality for old, unloved gerrit reviews.
> I've got a first implementation of a tool to do that:
> https://github.com/cybertron/tripleo-auto-aban
On 2015-10-09 17:10:15 -0500 (-0500), Ben Nemec wrote:
> As discussed in the meeting a week or two ago, we would like to bring
> back the auto-abandon functionality for old, unloved gerrit reviews.
[...]
> -WIP patches are never abandoned
[...]
> -Patches that are failing CI for over a month on the
Hi OoOers,
As discussed in the meeting a week or two ago, we would like to bring
back the auto-abandon functionality for old, unloved gerrit reviews.
I've got a first implementation of a tool to do that:
https://github.com/cybertron/tripleo-auto-abandon
It currently follows these rules for determ
