esign proposal work.
>
>
>
> --Rocky
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:*David Kranz [mailto:dkr...@redhat.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, April 04, 2014 6:10 AM
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [RFC
this
design proposal work.
--Rocky
From: David Kranz [mailto:dkr...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 6:10 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [RFC] Tempest without branches
On 04/04/2014 07:37 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
An int
On 04/04/2014 07:37 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
An interesting conversation has cropped up over the last few days in -qa
and -infra which I want to bring to the wider OpenStack community. When
discussing the use of Tempest as part of the Defcore validation we came
to an interesting question:
Why does
An interesting conversation has cropped up over the last few days in -qa
and -infra which I want to bring to the wider OpenStack community. When
discussing the use of Tempest as part of the Defcore validation we came
to an interesting question:
Why does Tempest have stable/* branches? Does it need
