For anyone following along this will be discussed in the OpenStackClient and
SDKs and project libraries sessions [1] [2].
Everett
[1] http://junodesignsummit.sched.org/event/ae9afc77278abb98f0fc35a540a1bb0b
[2] http://junodesignsummit.sched.org/event/9c99888fba09c643834d4ef9241cc90a
On May 7,
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Dean Troyer wrote:
> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>> Would client tools be limited to only a pythonSDK or in the future could
>> it potentially have other languages?
>>
>
> There are a handful of other language projects active on Stackforge
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> Would client tools be limited to only a pythonSDK or in the future could
> it potentially have other languages?
>
There are a handful of other language projects active on Stackforge that
have expressed interest in joining the program when they
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Brian Curtin wrote:
> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Doug Hellmann
> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Joe Gordon
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Dean Troyer wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Thierry Carrez
On Apr 28, 2014, at 8:20 AM, Dean Troyer
mailto:dtro...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I want to open the discussion of an OpenStack Client Tools program proposal to
a wider audience. It would initially consist of OpenStackClient and eventually
add the existing SDK projects as they are ready to join. The
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Dean Troyer wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Thierry Carrez
>>> wrote:
Would you take over the Python client libraries as
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Dean Troyer wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Thierry Carrez
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Would you take over the Python client libraries as well ? On one hand
>>> they need /some/ domain expertise, but on
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> 1. At first ClientTools consist of just the OpenStackClient
> 2. When the pythonSDK is ready to move off of stackforge, it will live in
> ClientTools
>
Yes to both of these
> 3. Specific python-*clients will be rewritten (from scratch?) to us
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Dean Troyer wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>
>> Would you take over the Python client libraries as well ? On one hand
>> they need /some/ domain expertise, but on the other I see no reason to
>> special-case Python against other SDKs
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Dean Troyer wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Thierry Carrez
> wrote:
>>
>> Would you take over the Python client libraries as well ? On one hand
>> they need /some/ domain expertise, but on the other I see no reason to
>> special-case Python against other S
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Anne Gentle wrote:
>
> I believe that UX and DevEx are different areas of expertise and OpenStack
> could benefit more from a separate focused DevEx program
>
Agreed.
> I'm not sure Dean's proposal is quite "DevEx" though, and I don't know if
> a rename alone wou
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>> Dean Troyer wrote:
>>> I want to open the discussion of an OpenStack Client Tools program
>>> proposal to a wider audience. It would initially consist of
>>> OpenStackClient and eventu
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Would you take over the Python client libraries as well ? On one hand
> they need /some/ domain expertise, but on the other I see no reason to
> special-case Python against other SDKs, and that may give the libraries
> a bit more attention an
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Dean Troyer wrote:
>> I want to open the discussion of an OpenStack Client Tools program
>> proposal to a wider audience. It would initially consist of
>> OpenStackClient and eventually add the existing SDK projects as they are
>> ready to j
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Dean Troyer wrote:
> > I want to open the discussion of an OpenStack Client Tools program
> > proposal to a wider audience. It would initially consist of
> > OpenStackClient and eventually add the existing SDK projects as they are
> > ready
Dean Troyer wrote:
> I want to open the discussion of an OpenStack Client Tools program
> proposal to a wider audience. It would initially consist of
> OpenStackClient and eventually add the existing SDK projects as they are
> ready to join. The initial wiki page is at
> https://wiki.openstack.org
I want to open the discussion of an OpenStack Client Tools program proposal
to a wider audience. It would initially consist of OpenStackClient and
eventually add the existing SDK projects as they are ready to join. The
initial wiki page is at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ClientTools. I do
want
17 matches
Mail list logo
