> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:berra...@redhat.com]
> Sent: 20 August 2014 14:13
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Scheduler split wrt Extensible Resource
> Tracking
>
&
Original Message-
From: Nikola Đipanov [mailto:ndipa...@redhat.com
<mailto:ndipa...@redhat.com>]
Sent: 19 August 2014 17:50
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Scheduler split wrt Extensible
Resource
On 08/20/2014 02:33 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 08/20/2014 04:48 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
>> Fair enough - I will WIP the revert until Phil is back. It's the right
>> thing to do seeing that he is away.
>
> Well, it's as much (or more?) Paul Murray and Andrea Rosa :)
>
Yes sorry - meant to say Pa
>>>>-Original Message-
> >>>>From: Nikola Đipanov [mailto:ndipa...@redhat.com
> >><mailto:ndipa...@redhat.com>]
> >>>>Sent: 19 August 2014 17:50
> >>>>To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> >><
ent: 19 August 2014 17:50
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Scheduler split wrt Extensible
Resource
Tracking
On 08/19/2014 06:39 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
On the other hand, ERT discussion is decoup
t;]
>> > Sent: 19 August 2014 17:50
>> > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
>> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Scheduler split wrt Extensible
> Resource
>> > Tracking
>> >
>>
On Aug 19, 2014 10:45 AM, "Day, Phil" wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Nikola Đipanov [mailto:ndipa...@redhat.com]
> > Sent: 19 August 2014 17:50
> > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Scheduler
> -Original Message-
> From: Nikola Đipanov [mailto:ndipa...@redhat.com]
> Sent: 19 August 2014 17:50
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Scheduler split wrt Extensible Resource
> Tracking
>
> On 08/19/2014 06:39 PM, Syl
On 08/19/2014 06:39 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
> On the other hand, ERT discussion is decoupled from the scheduler split
> discussion and will be delayed until Extensible Resource Tracker owner
> (Paul Murray) is back from vacation.
> In the mean time, we're considering new patches using ERT as
> non
Le 19/08/2014 14:51, Sylvain Bauza a écrit :
Hi,
As it was also stated in
http://www.stillhq.com/openstack/juno/12.html, we expect to finish
the prerequisites for Scheduler split by Juno. That requires to merge
two blueprints, one with the spec validated but patches still under
review [
Hi,
As it was also stated in
http://www.stillhq.com/openstack/juno/12.html, we expect to finish
the prerequisites for Scheduler split by Juno. That requires to merge
two blueprints, one with the spec validated but patches still under
review [1] and one with the spec still subject to debat
11 matches
Mail list logo
