Cool - thanks for clarifying that!
Neil
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 5:20 PM Armando M. wrote:
> On 8 July 2016 at 08:22, Neil Jerram wrote:
>
>> Hi Armando,
>>
>> Who exactly are you addressing here? AFAICS, [1] on its own doesn't give
>> me (or anyone) any new rights for neutron-lib changes.
On 8 July 2016 at 08:22, Neil Jerram wrote:
> Hi Armando,
>
> Who exactly are you addressing here? AFAICS, [1] on its own doesn't give
> me (or anyone) any new rights for neutron-lib changes. It appears to be
> preparatory to a planned expansion of neutron-lib-core - but looking at
> [5], the m
Hi Armando,
Who exactly are you addressing here? AFAICS, [1] on its own doesn't give
me (or anyone) any new rights for neutron-lib changes. It appears to be
preparatory to a planned expansion of neutron-lib-core - but looking at
[5], the membership doesn't include me, or folk from many stadium
p
Hi Neutrinos,
As some of you may have noticed, since the merge of [1] you have now +2
rights on neutron-lib changes. Please make yourself familiar with review
guidelines [2]: in general, code that targets the library should go through
a much greater level of scrutiny and should be targeted if and
