Log from today's meeting:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_fwaas/2013/networking_fwaas.2013-10-30-18.03.log.html
We next meet at the summit, see you there.
Thanks,
~Sumit.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Sumit Naiksatam
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Reminder - we will have the Neutro
ajesh Mohan"
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List"
> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 2:48:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] FWaaS IceHouse summit prep and IRC
>meeting
>
> This is good discussion.
>
> +1 for using Neutron ports
m: *"Rajesh Mohan"
> *To: *"OpenStack Development Mailing List" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> *Sent: *Thursday, October 24, 2013 2:48:39 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] FWaaS IceHouse summit prep and
> IRCmeeting
>
> This
Hi All,
Reminder - we will have the Neutron FWaaS IRC meeting tomorrow Wednesday
18:00 UTC (11 AM PDT).
Agenda - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/FWaaS
Thanks,
~Sumit.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Sumit Naiksatam
wrote:
> Log from today's meeting:
>
>
> http://eavesdrop.openstack
're not able to
create a rule with zones before a Firewall is created)? Definitely not VM's
port
Thanks,
-Kaiwei
- Original Message -
From: "Rajesh Mohan"
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List"
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 2:48:39 PM
Subje
Bump in wire service can be within network (intra network) as you suggest
OR between network ( inter network ).
Advantage of bump in wire is one does not need networking config inside the
service.
Inter network bump in wire service is analogous to having service inserted
on link between two router
The bump-in-the-wire mode we were referring to here is the one where the
firewall has both legs on the same subnet/network. The point that was
trying to be made was that applying zones in that case would not make as
much sense. At this point there is no proposal though to validate and
restrict this
This is good discussion.
+1 for using Neutron ports for defining zones. I see Kaiwei's point but for
DELL, neutron ports makes more sense.
I am not sure if I completely understood the bump-in-the-wire/zone
discussion. DELL security appliance allows using different zones with
bump-in-the-wire. If
Log from today's meeting:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_fwaas/2013/networking_fwaas.2013-10-23-18.02.log.html
Action items for some of the folks included.
Please join us for the meeting next week.
Thanks,
~Sumit.
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Sumit Naiksatam
wrote:
> R
Reminder - we will have the Neutron FWaaS IRC meeting tomorrow Wednesday
18:00 UTC (11 AM PDT).
Agenda:
* Tempest tests
* Definition and use of zones
* Address Objects
* Counts API
* Service Objects
* Integration with service type framework
* Open discussion - any other topics you would like to br
Hi All,
We had the FWaaS IRC meeting today, please check the logs if you could not
attend:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_fwaas/2013/networking_fwaas.2013-10-16-18.01.log.html
We will have the next one same day/time (Wednesday 18:00 UTC/11 AM PDT)
next week, hope you can join
Hi All,
For the next of phase of FWaaS development we will be considering a number
of features. I am proposing an IRC meeting on Oct 16th Wednesday 18:00 UTC
(11 AM PDT) to discuss this.
The etherpad for the summit session proposal is here:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-neutron-fwaas
12 matches
Mail list logo
