ge questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Date: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 4:52 PM
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] BGP suppo
s)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 4:52 PM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] BGP support
Gary,
I'm
...@vmware.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2016 11:36 PM
To: OpenStack List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] BGP support
Hi,
In the M cycle BGP support was added in tree. I have seen specs in the L2 GW
project for this support too. Are we planning to consolidate the efforts? Will
the BGP code be moved from
.@vmware.com>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] BGP support
Hi Gary,
The new L2GW spec is [1] comes to enable inter-cloud connection to stretch the
network between the local and the remote clouds using tunnels between border
VTEP devices.
VTEP can be populated manually with remote M
Hi Gary,
The new L2GW spec is [1] comes to enable inter-cloud connection to stretch
the network between the local and the remote clouds using tunnels between
border VTEP devices.
VTEP can be populated manually with remote MAC (optionally) IP entries.
BGP support is a bit orthogonal or may I say com
st fragmenting things even more
> …
>
> From: Hirofumi Ichihara
> Reply-To: OpenStack List
> Date: Monday, March 28, 2016 at 10:50 AM
> To: OpenStack List
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] BGP support
>
> Hi Gary,
>
> You can look at the discussion in here[
ck-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Monday, March 28, 2016 at 10:50 AM
To: OpenStack List
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] BGP support
Hi Gary,
You can look at the discussion in here[1, 2]
[1]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/
Hi Gary,
You can look at the discussion in here[1, 2]
[1]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1560003
[2]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/268726
Thanks,
Hirofumi
On 2016/03/28 15:36, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
In the M cycle BGP support was added in tree. I have seen specs in the
L2 GW pr
Hi,
In the M cycle BGP support was added in tree. I have seen specs in the L2 GW
project for this support too. Are we planning to consolidate the efforts? Will
the BGP code be moved from the Neutron git to the L2-GW project? Will a new
project be created?
Sorry, a little in the dark here and it
