Hi,
Sure they must have the same provider.
Loadbalancer instance could be created in two ways:
- implicitly with pool creation, then provider for the pool becomes
provider for the instance.
- explicitly, with pool created later on and attached to the instance.
In that case provider attribute will
Hi Eugene, Iwamoto
> You are correct. Provider attribute will remain in the pool due to API
> compatibility reasons.
I agree with you.
I just wanted to make sure pools in a loadblancer can have
different providers or not. (I think it should be same.)
Thanks
Itsuto Ofa
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 12:48:3
Hi Iwamoto,
You are correct. Provider attribute will remain in the pool due to API
compatibility reasons.
Thanks,
Eugene.
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:35 AM, IWAMOTO Toshihiro wrote:
> At Fri, 29 Nov 2013 07:25:54 +0900,
> Itsuro ODA wrote:
> >
> > Hi Eugene,
> >
> > Thank you for the response.
>
At Fri, 29 Nov 2013 07:25:54 +0900,
Itsuro ODA wrote:
>
> Hi Eugene,
>
> Thank you for the response.
>
> I have a comment.
> I think 'provider' attribute should be added to loadbalance resource
> and used rather than pool's 'provider' since I think using multiple
> driver within a loadbalancer d
Hi,
I found it in /meeting/nuetron_lbaas.
(neutron -> nuetron)
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 07:51:56 +0900
Itsuro ODA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can't find the 28th meeting log.
> (Does not logs automatically generated ?)
>
> Thanks.
> --
> Itsuro ODA
>
>
> ___
Hi,
I can't find the 28th meeting log.
(Does not logs automatically generated ?)
Thanks.
--
Itsuro ODA
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Hi Eugene,
Thank you for the response.
I have a comment.
I think 'provider' attribute should be added to loadbalance resource
and used rather than pool's 'provider' since I think using multiple
driver within a loadbalancer does not make sense.
What do you think ?
I'm looking forward to your code
Hi Itsuro,
I've updated the wiki with some examples of cli workflow that illustrate
proposed API.
Please see the updated page:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/LoadbalancerInstance#API_change
Thanks,
Eugene.
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Itsuro ODA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to
Hi,
I'd like to review about LoadblancerInstance API specification.
Please update wiki page before the meeting.
(It is a little bit hard to follow in the IRC for me since
I'm not English native. so I'd like to consider for the
API beforehand.)
Thanks.
Itsuro Oda
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:07:47 +04
Hi Neutron folks,
LBaaS subteam meeting will be on Thursday, 27, at 14-00 UTC as usual.
We'll discuss current progress and continue with feature design.
Thanks,
Eugene.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openst
10 matches
Mail list logo
