Yes, let's discuss this in Tokyo.
Shinobu
- Original Message -
From: "Clinton Knight"
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2015 2:15:52 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] CephFS native driver
Hi, John. If you want to discuss this in Tokyo, I suggest you add it to
the etherpad:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/manila-mitaka-summit-topics
I look forward to meeting you at the Summit. It¹d be great to see a demo
of your Ceph driver.
Clinton
On 10/7/15, 6:56 AM, "John Spray" wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote:
>>
>> Currently, as you say, a share is accessible to anyone who knows the
>> auth key (created a the time the share is created).
>>
>> For adding the allow/deny path, I'd simply create and remove new ceph
>> keys for each entity being allowed/
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 3:32 PM, John Spray wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 7:19 PM, John Spray wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I've recently started work on a CephFS driver for Manila. The (early)
> >> code is here:
> >> http
> For ultra isolation, the RADOS pools would also be configured to map to
> different OSDs.
This is really good idea, and will be motivation to me.
> Separate RADOS namespaces do not provide physical separation (multiple
> namespaces exist within one pool, hence on the same OSDs), but they
> wou
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote:
>> > I think it will be important to document all of these limitations. I
>> > wouldn't let them stop you from getting the driver done, but if I was a
>> > deployer I'd want to know about these details.
>>
>> Yes, definitely. I'm also adding an
patch didn't come as a complete surprise.
John
>
> Shinobu
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ben Swartzlander"
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>
> Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015 9:27:58 AM
> Subject
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 7:19 PM, John Spray wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've recently started work on a CephFS driver for Manila. The (early)
>> code is here:
>> https://github.com/openstack/manila/compare/master...jcsp:ceph
>>
>
> 1) REA
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 4:32 PM, John Spray wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 1:27 AM, Ben Swartzlander
> wrote:
> > On 09/24/2015 09:49 AM, John Spray wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I've recently started work on a CephFS driver for Manila. The (early)
> >> code is here:
> >> https://github.
27:58 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] CephFS native driver
On 09/24/2015 09:49 AM, John Spray wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've recently started work on a CephFS driver for Manila. The (early)
> code is here:
> https://github.com/openstack/manila/compare/master...jcsp:ceph
Awesome! Thi
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 12:02 PM, John Spray wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 1:27 AM, Ben Swartzlander
> wrote:
>> All snapshots are read-only... The question is whether you can take a
>> snapshot and clone it into something that's writable. We're looking at
>> allowing for different kinds of s
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 1:27 AM, Ben Swartzlander wrote:
> On 09/24/2015 09:49 AM, John Spray wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've recently started work on a CephFS driver for Manila. The (early)
>> code is here:
>> https://github.com/openstack/manila/compare/master...jcsp:ceph
>
>
> Awesome! This is
On 09/24/2015 09:49 AM, John Spray wrote:
Hi all,
I've recently started work on a CephFS driver for Manila. The (early)
code is here:
https://github.com/openstack/manila/compare/master...jcsp:ceph
Awesome! This is something that's been talking about for quite some time
and I'm pleased to see
Thanks!
Keep me in the loop.
Shinobu
- Original Message -
From: "John Spray"
To: "Shinobu Kinjo"
Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 6:54:09 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] CephFS
ds).
John
>
>
>> This piece of work is specifically about Manila; general improvements
>> in Ceph integration would be a different topic.
>
> That's interesting to me.
>
> Shinobu
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "John Spray"
> To: &
n would be a different topic.
That's interesting to me.
Shinobu
- Original Message -
From: "John Spray"
To: "Shinobu Kinjo"
Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 5:51:36 PM
Subject: Re: [op
ally about Manila; general improvements
in Ceph integration would be a different topic.
Thanks,
John
>
> Thank you so much for your explanation in advance.
>
> Shinobu
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "John Spray"
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, &
- Original Message -
From: "John Spray"
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, "Ceph Development"
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 10:49:17 PM
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Manila] CephFS native driver
Hi all,
I've recently started work on a CephFS driver for
Hi all,
I've recently started work on a CephFS driver for Manila. The (early)
code is here:
https://github.com/openstack/manila/compare/master...jcsp:ceph
It requires a special branch of ceph which is here:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/compare/master...jcsp:wip-manila
This isn't done yet (hence
19 matches
Mail list logo
