Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Packaging CI for Fuel

2016-03-22 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-03-22 15:20:22 + (+), Tristan Cacqueray wrote: [...] > With only my VMT hat on, this makes me wonder why the packaging needs > special care. Is there a reason why stable branch aren't built continuously? [...] My concern was more over handling packaging-specific security vulnerabil

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Packaging CI for Fuel

2016-03-22 Thread Tristan Cacqueray
On 03/19/2016 06:53 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-03-19 05:10:18 -0500 (-0500), Monty Taylor wrote: > [...] >> It would also be good to tie off with the security team about >> this. One of the reasons we stopped publishing debs years ago is >> that it made us a de-facto derivative distro. Peo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Packaging CI for Fuel

2016-03-21 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 03/19/2016 11:10 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > The patch looks good, but it conflicts with the > move-nova-jobs-to-db-macro and the "add debian jessie support for bindep > fallback" change. Rather than fighting the rebase fight, let's put a > brief hold on this (sorry, I know) and land it as soon as

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Packaging CI for Fuel

2016-03-20 Thread Aleksandra Fedorova
Hi, everyone, we'd like to announce Packaging CI for Fuel. For now there are no extended tests, just package builds. Package-based test will be added later in Newton development cycle. Current workflow: * for every request we build a package and publish it to temporary repository, which you can

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Packaging CI for Fuel

2016-03-19 Thread Vladimir Kozhukalov
Hi, > Are there any effort on OpenStack packaging? The short answer is yes. We are putting efforts to migrate all our packaging activities to the community RPM/DEB projects. Long story is as follows: At the moment Fuel is distributed as a set of RPM packages. This Packaging CI that Aleksandra m

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Packaging CI for Fuel

2016-03-19 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-03-19 05:10:18 -0500 (-0500), Monty Taylor wrote: [...] > It would also be good to tie off with the security team about > this. One of the reasons we stopped publishing debs years ago is > that it made us a de-facto derivative distro. People were using > our packages in production, includin

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Packaging CI for Fuel

2016-03-19 Thread Emilien Macchi
Are they any effort on OpenStack packaging? http://governance.openstack.org/reference/projects/packaging-deb.html http://governance.openstack.org/reference/projects/packaging-rpm.html I would like to see packaging built & tested by OpenStack Infra, so downstream CI (Fuel, Puppet OpenStack, Triple

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Packaging CI for Fuel

2016-03-19 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 03/16/2016 06:22 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Are they any effort on OpenStack packaging? > > http://governance.openstack.org/reference/projects/packaging-deb.html > http://governance.openstack.org/reference/projects/packaging-rpm.html > > I would like to see packaging built & tested by OpenSta

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Packaging CI for Fuel

2016-03-19 Thread Monty Taylor
On 03/17/2016 03:11 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 03/16/2016 06:22 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: Are they any effort on OpenStack packaging? http://governance.openstack.org/reference/projects/packaging-deb.html http://governance.openstack.org/reference/projects/packaging-rpm.html I would like to se