Hey Evgeniy,
> if we drop containers, those will be just rpm/deb packages and
> dependencies between them
Despite the fact I'm a big fan of Docker and the ideas it brings to us
(build, ship & deploy fast), I'd prefer to go with RPM/DEB packages.
Simply because it would be easy to support and upda
Thanks Eugene. I'd recommend to start integration as early as possible...
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 2:11 AM Evgeniy L wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> 1. our plan is to have working partitioning/provisioning in a couple of
> weeks,
> networking is more complicated and it's better to ask Vladimir/Ryan.
>
Hi Mike,
1. our plan is to have working partitioning/provisioning in a couple of
weeks,
networking is more complicated and it's better to ask Vladimir/Ryan.
2, 3. here we have just some general ideas, we should have independent
releases on pypi,
each component should have responsible perso
This is great start, Evgeny.
I have a few questions:
1. When do you expect to have POC to show?
2. Do you plan to put new services into separate repos?
3. How do you plan to package those - will you create RPM package for
each, as well as Docker container (as we have everything in cont
Hey Evgeniy.
This is awesome news1 I believe that microservices is way to go.
Despite the fact that them bring a set of classical problems (e.g.
duplication of domain entities) we will win more than loose. :)
If there will be any specs or design meetings, please send me invite -
I'd gladly join d
Hi,
We are starting Fuel modularization POC activity which is basically in one
sentence
can be explained as "Use Fuel without Fuel", it means that we want to
provide
for a user a way to use some good things from Fuel, without entire master
node and
other parts which user doesn't need.
Currently w
