Sorry for delay in responding on this. Comments inline.
On 05/29/2018 07:33 PM, Nadathur, Sundar wrote:
Hi all,
The Cyborg/Nova scheduling spec [1] details what traits will be
applied to the resource providers that represent devices like GPUs. Some
of the traits referred to vendor names. I
After reading the spec
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/554717/14/doc/specs/rocky/cyborg-nova-sched.rst
,
I confuse on the CUSTOM_ACCELERATOR_FPGA meaning. Initially, I thought it
means a region. But after reading the spec, it can be a device, a region or
a function. Is it on purpose design?
Sound
I can help on it.
2018-05-31 21:49 GMT+08:00 Eric Fried :
> Yup. I'm sure reviewers will bikeshed the names, but the review is the
> appropriate place for that to happen.
>
> A couple of test changes will also be required. You can have a look at
> [1] as an example to follow.
>
> -efried
>
> [1
Yup. I'm sure reviewers will bikeshed the names, but the review is the
appropriate place for that to happen.
A couple of test changes will also be required. You can have a look at
[1] as an example to follow.
-efried
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/511180/
On 05/31/2018 01:02 AM, Nadathu
On 5/30/2018 1:18 PM, Eric Fried wrote:
This all sounds fully reasonable to me. One thing, though...
* There is a resource class per device category e.g.
CUSTOM_ACCELERATOR_GPU, CUSTOM_ACCELERATOR_FPGA.
Let's propose standard resource classes for these ASAP.
https://github.co
This all sounds fully reasonable to me. One thing, though...
>> * There is a resource class per device category e.g.
>> CUSTOM_ACCELERATOR_GPU, CUSTOM_ACCELERATOR_FPGA.
Let's propose standard resource classes for these ASAP.
https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/d741f624c81baf89f
Hi Sylvain,
Glad to know we are on the same page. I haven't updated the spec with
this proposal yet, in case I got more comments :). I will do so by today.
Thanks,
Sundar
On 5/30/2018 12:34 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:33 AM, Nadathur, Sundar
mailto:sundar.nadat...@
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:33 AM, Nadathur, Sundar wrote:
> Hi all,
>The Cyborg/Nova scheduling spec [1] details what traits will be applied
> to the resource providers that represent devices like GPUs. Some of the
> traits referred to vendor names. I got feedback that traits must not refer
>
Hi all,
The Cyborg/Nova scheduling spec [1] details what traits will be
applied to the resource providers that represent devices like GPUs. Some
of the traits referred to vendor names. I got feedback that traits must
not refer to products or specific models of devices. I agree. However,
we
