Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Scale deployment

2017-01-09 Thread gordon chung
On 09/01/17 07:21 PM, Srikanth Vavilapalli wrote: > Thanks Gordon for your inputs, Quick follow-up question: I see few new > alternatives existing in place of ceilometer mongo storage: Gnocchi and > Panko. Are these recommended data storage options from now on for Ceilometer? > Also, I suppose

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Scale deployment

2017-01-09 Thread Srikanth Vavilapalli
in a cluster mode to support scale and performance. Plz let me know if otherwise. Thanks Srikanth -Original Message- From: gordon chung [mailto:g...@live.ca] Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 6:58 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Scale

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Scale deployment

2017-01-09 Thread gordon chung
On 08/01/17 07:28 PM, Srikanth Vavilapalli wrote: > > - Deploying database cluster on separate nodes with sharding > and replica-sets enabled > we don't recommend you use ceilometer storage since it's deprecated and hasn't been worked on for over a year. > > > My questions are: > > 1.

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Scale deployment

2017-01-08 Thread Srikanth Vavilapalli
Hi Can anyone plz point me to any document that captures how Ceilometer can be deployed in a scaled environment? I found in different documentation that Ceilometer can be configured for scaled environment (as below), but could not find a unified document that covers all the details together fo