Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA

2014-07-12 Thread Clark, Robert Graham
k Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); >a...@redhat.com >Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA > >On 06/25/2014 02:42 PM, Clark, Robert Graham wrote: >> >> Ok, I’ll hack together a dev plugin over the next week or so, other work >> notwithstan

Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA

2014-06-28 Thread John Wood
: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA On 06/25/2014 02:42 PM, Clark, Robert Graham wrote: > > Ok, I’ll hack together a dev plugin over the next week or so, other work > notwithstanding. Where possible I’ll probably borrow from the dog tag > plugin as I’ve not looked closely a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA

2014-06-26 Thread Clark, Robert Graham
gt;> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 24/06/2014 18:57, "John Wood" wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello Robert, >>>>>> >>>>>> I would actually hope we have a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA

2014-06-25 Thread Nathan Kinder
>>>>> Hello Robert, >>>>> >>>>> I would actually hope we have a self-contained certificate plugin >>>>> implementation that runs 'out of the box' to enable certificate >>>>> generation orders to be evaluated and de

Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA

2014-06-25 Thread Clark, Robert Graham
tion that runs 'out of the box' to enable certificate >> >>generation orders to be evaluated and demo-ed on local boxes. >> >> >> >>Is this what you were thinking though? >> >> >> >>Thanks, >> >>John >> >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA

2014-06-25 Thread Ade Lee
actually hope we have a self-contained certificate plugin > >>implementation that runs 'out of the box' to enable certificate > >>generation orders to be evaluated and demo-ed on local boxes. > >> > >>Is this what you were thinking though? > >> &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA

2014-06-25 Thread Jarret Raim
t;>________________ >>From: Clark, Robert Graham [robert.cl...@hp.com] >>Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:36 AM >>To: OpenStack List >>Subject: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA >> >>Hi all, >> >>I¹m sure this has been

Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA

2014-06-24 Thread Clark, Robert Graham
day, June 24, 2014 10:36 AM >To: OpenStack List >Subject: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA > >Hi all, > >I¹m sure this has been discussed somewhere and I¹ve just missed it. > >Is there any value in creating a basic ŒCA¹ and plugin to satisfy >tests/integration in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA

2014-06-24 Thread John Wood
anks, John From: Clark, Robert Graham [robert.cl...@hp.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:36 AM To: OpenStack List Subject: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA Hi all, I’m sure this has been discussed somewhere and I’ve just missed it. Is there any value in creating a basic ‘CA’

[openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA

2014-06-24 Thread Clark, Robert Graham
Hi all, I’m sure this has been discussed somewhere and I’ve just missed it. Is there any value in creating a basic ‘CA’ and plugin to satisfy tests/integration in Barbican? I’m thinking something that probably performs OpenSSL certificate operations itself, ugly but perhaps useful for some thin