Hi,
I saw magnum nodegroup specs https://review.openstack.org/425422,
https://review.openstack.org/433680, and
https://review.openstack.org/425431 were last updated a year ago. is there
any plan to resume this work or is it superseded by other specs or features?
Thanks!
Regards,
Wan-yen
__
In Nisha's message, "capabilities" refers to "ComputeCapabilitiesFilter".
"capabilities" provides a lot of flexibility for scheduling. It supports
qualitative as well as quantitative attributes. It supports a variety of
operators such as ">=", "<", "=", etc. For instance, with "capabilities",
>>* Nisha is raising the question about whether or not we're making
*>>* incorrect assumptions about how people are using nova/ironic and they
*>>* want to use the non-Exact filters for VCPU/MEMORY_MB/DISK_GB, which as
*>>* far as I have ever heard is not recommended/supported upstream as it can
*>
Hi Wangjun,
Can you provide more info?
What driver did you use?
What's your target_raid_config?
What do the logical drives look like after the configuration?
Any log, server and storage hardware and firmware version info you can
share?
You are welcome to contact ilo_driv..
Hi Jim,
I have asked techtalk coordinator to switch my techtalk session time so
there is no need to change group management session schedule. You can keep
it at 2:50pm Wed.. Thanks!
wanyen
__
OpenStack Development Mailin
As mentioned in the weekly IRC, 3rd-party vendor drivers are ranked lower
priority and therefore their code tend to merge at the late cycle of a
release. Therefore, it leads little time for driver author to submit
document and for upstream to review and approve the document. So, as the
result,
Hi Jim,
My techtalk is supposed to finish by 2:45pm. However, techtalk schedule
is not as well monitored as formal sessions so it could get delayed.
That's why I was exploring whether the group management session can be
switched to Thursday. Thanks!
Wanyen
>>* Hi Jim, *> >* Is it possible
Hi Jim,
Is it possible to switch Group management session to Thursday? I
have a techtalk at 2:30pm on Wednesday and it makes it very tight for me
and Shiv to attend the group management at 2:50 pm. Since Shiv and myself
are the proposer for the group management session, we want to be able
I fully agreed with Ramesh. There is a need for driver owners to be able
to quickly update their driver’s document. Particularly, vendor's drivers
have strong dependencies on their platform’s firmware. For instance, a new
release of firmware may have impact on vendor’s driver and may require a
xpose the feature in
>the UI, when there is already working back-end solution, feel free to
>send a patch which adds that to the HW info - it's an easy addition and
the UI is prepared for such types of expansions.
ok. Thanks!
wanyen
>Hi Wan,
>thanks for great
Hi Jaromir,
> Excerpts from Jaromir Coufal's message of 2014-07-09 07:51:56 +:
>> Hey folks,
>>
>> after few rounds of reviews and feedbacks, I am sending wireframes,
>> which are ready for implementation in Juno:
>>
>>
http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/juno/2014-07-09_nodes-u
Hi Devananda,
I noticed that firmware update is not on the priority list. I thought
there was strong interest in this capability. The design spec of
out-of-band firmware update has been submitted
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/100842/. We will address the review
comments and uplaod a new ve
12 matches
Mail list logo
