As usual, it's an open decision, please vote +1/-1 about this proposal.
Hi!
I'm not puppet-openstack core anymore, but I already worked with Sofer, and
I think it's very valuable for the team to have him as core!
Thanks Sofer for all your work and engagement since the
project is now.
So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish
I whish you the best ♥
Seb
¹http://www.openstack.org/legal/community-code-of-conduct/
²http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/puppetopenstack-group/90
--
Sebastien Badia
signature.asc
Descri
ing or help
> people.
>
> I think we're very lucky to have Alex part of our group and I would like
> to promote him core reviewer of all our modules.
>
> Team, please vote if you like the idea,
Hi,
A big +1 for me!
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 11:49:08AM (-0500), Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Back in "old days", Cody was already core on the modules, when they were
> hosted by Puppetlabs namespace.
> His contributions [1] are very valuable to the group:
> * strong knowledge on Puppet and all dependencies in gene
shown a good
> > understanding of puppet-openstack.
> >
> > +1
>
> +1
>
> He has been really involved and proactive (reviews + commits) in the
> community during the past months.
A big +1 also!
Denis is very involved in our community, and he has a very valua
15.00.html
³https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+branch:master+topic:msync_rspec_version,n,z
--
Sebastien Badia
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for u
et/
Ps, all our meetings + notes are logged also here
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/PuppetOpenStack
I just fixed the meeting_id for the « past meeting » link of eavesdrop
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Puppet_OpenStack_Team_Meeting
https://review.openstack.org/207389
Have
le provider for the module
> > keystone_config {'DEFAULT/foo': value => 'bar', default => 'bar'}
I'm not sure to see the difference with the Yanis solution here¹, and not sure
to see the link between the define resource and the type/provider resour
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 03:06:56PM (-0400), Emilien Macchi wrote:
> I would like to open the vote to promote Yanis part of Puppet OpenStack
> core reviewers.
Hi,
Yes, of course!
A big +1
Seb
--
Sebastien Badia
signature.asc
Description: Digital sig
ame starting by puppet- something in
order to easily catch-up all our modules?
Yanis, Seb
¹https://github.com/garethr/puppet-module-skeleton
²https://github.com/enovance/puppet-module-skeleton
³https://github.com/openstack-dev/cookiecutter
--
Sebastien Badia
signature.asc
Description: Di
ly that
the tests are interdependent and will complicate over the time).
Anyway, Thanks for the progress that's cool!
Seb
--
Sebastien Badia
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Maili
nstack.org/pipermail/openstack-tc/2015-March/000940.html
²https://github.com/puppet-community/community-triage/blob/master/core/notes/2015-03-25.md
--
Sebastien Badia
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__
OpenStack Developme
ithub.com/openstack/governance/blob/master/resolutions/20141202-project-structure-reform-spec.rst
--
Sebastien Badia
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
U
s):
- https://github.com/openstack-infra/release-tools
- https://github.com/markmc/openstack-lp-scripts
- https://github.com/dolph/launchpad
But we wait the publishing of Mathieu scripts :)
Seb
--
Sebastien Badia
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__
a piece of software, and we must
as much as possible follow upstream configurations and focus on our modules not
enough « mature ». Every OpenStack core project¹ must have a mature puppet
module.
Seb
¹http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/projects.yaml
--
Sebastien B
eers,
Seb
--
Sebastien Badia
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
16 matches
Mail list logo
