On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Ryu Ishimoto wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Sandro Mathys wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Galo Navarro wrote:
>>>
>> Honestly, I don't think this discussion is leading anywhere.
>> Therefore, I'd l
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Galo Navarro wrote:
>
>
> On 10 December 2015 at 04:35, Sandro Mathys wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Galo Navarro wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> >> I think the goal of this split is well explai
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Galo Navarro wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I think the goal of this split is well explained by Sandro in the first
>> mails of the chain:
>>
>> 1. Downstream packaging
>> 2. Tagging the delivery properly as a library
>> 3. Adding as a project on pypi
>
> Not really, because (
As discussed [1] and announced [2], #midonet is now the official
MidoNet development channel.
We've now also got the three OpenStack service bots approved:
1) meetbot (nickname: openstack), in order to have a properly logged
meetings in #midonet. Note that our regular meetings are scheduled to
ha
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Sandro Mathys wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As Takashi Yamamoto raised in another thread [0], python-midonetclient
> should be split out into its own repo. There's two major reasons for
> this:
>
> 1) (Downstream) packaging: midonet and python-midone
Hi,
As Takashi Yamamoto raised in another thread [0], python-midonetclient
should be split out into its own repo. There's two major reasons for
this:
1) (Downstream) packaging: midonet and python-midonetclient are two
distinct packages, and therefore should have distinct upstream
tarballs - which
e:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +1 for #2
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> PS: Beware of the top-posting! It makes vote counting harder ;-)
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Sandro Mathys
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Sandro Mathys wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Trying to prepare moving our repos to the OpenStack infrastructure, I
> got reminded just how many repos we have in our GitHub organization
> [1] - and how many of those seem to be deprecated or tangential.
>
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Sandro Mathys wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Takashi Yamamoto
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Takashi Yamamoto
>>> wrote:
>>>> hi,
>>>>
>>>>
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Takashi Yamamoto
> wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> we are going to migrate networking-midonet meeting from slack to irc.
>> the plan is to have it 7:00 UTC on every Tuesdays.
>> if you are interested but have a differ
Hi all,
Trying to prepare moving our repos to the OpenStack infrastructure, I
got reminded just how many repos we have in our GitHub organization
[1] - and how many of those seem to be deprecated or tangential.
Now, do we still want to migrate them? Pretty sure the answer is "no"
for the deprecat
Hi,
Our IRC channels have been neglected for a long time, and as a result
we lost ownership of #midonet-dev, which is now owner by
freenode-staff. In theory, it should be very easy to get ownership
back, particularly since we still own #midonet. But in reality, it
seems like none of the freenode s
Since we're moving to use this mailing list and other OpenStack
infrastructure soon, I thought I should forward the results of our
recent MidoNet PTL elections to the openstack-dev list.
-- Sandro
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sandro Mathys
Date: Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 10:
Hello everyone,
This is just a heads up that Thierry Carrez was so kind as to add a
new topic to the openstack-dev mailing list for the MidoNet dev team.
We currently use our own mailing list [1] but plan to move our
discussions here rather sooner than later.
Last chance to adjust your filters! ;
14 matches
Mail list logo
