ecan/pecan/issues/72
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Ryan Petrello
Senior Developer, DreamHost
ryan.pe
bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Ryan Petrello
Senior Developer, DreamHost
ryan.petre...@dreamhost.com
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Nick Markov
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Ryan Petrello
Senior Developer, DreamHost
ryan.petre...@dreamhost.com
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>> -jay
> >>>>
> >>>> ___
> >>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >>>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> >>>> h
us can and do find things we
> >> don't like about *all* of the projects that we work on. The difference
> >> between team players and non-team players is that team players strongly
> >> weigh their decisions and opinions based on what the team is doing and how
&
> [4] http://flask.pocoo.org/
> > [5] http://webpy.org/
> > [6] https://lists.launchpad.net/fuel-dev/msg01501.html
> >
> > ___
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> >
> slightly out of date but should give you a beter idea of our goals.
>
> Thanks
>
> > Eric,
> >
> > If you can give us some more information about your end goal, independent
> of the implementation, maybe we can propose an alternate technique to
> achieve
; > (Pdb) state.__dict__
> > > {'hooks': [,
> > > ,
> > > ,
> > > ], 'app':
> > > , 'request': > > 0x3ed7390 GET http://localhost:8777/v2/meters>, 'controller': None,
> > > 'response': }
>
n.core import state
> (Pdb) state.__dict__
> {'hooks': [,
> ,
> ,
> ], 'app':
> , 'request': http://localhost:8777/v2/meters>, 'controller': None, 'response': at 0x3ed74d0 200 OK>}
>
> > -Original Message-
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Ryan Petrello
Senior Developer, DreamHost
ryan.petre...@dreamhost.com
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
t;
> On Wed, 2014-07-02 at 17:24 -0400, Ryan Petrello wrote:
> > That's a pretty notable review to accommodate the pecan change. In the
> > meantime, wouldn't something like this would get the py26 and py27 tests
> > passing?
> >
> > index 9aced3f..
it returns the versions
> instead of an empty dictionary.
>
> Pablo.
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Ryan Petrello
Senior Developer, DreamHost
ryan.petre...@dreamhost.com
?highlight=gunicorn#gunicorn
---
Ryan Petrello
Senior Developer, DreamHost
ryan.petre...@dreamhost.com
On Mar 18, 2014, at 2:51 PM, Dmitriy Ukhlov wrote:
> Hello openstackers,
>
> We are working on MagnetoDB project and trying our best to follow OpenStack
> standards.
>
> So,
))]
)
---
Ryan Petrello
Senior Developer, DreamHost
ryan.petre...@dreamhost.com
On Mar 14, 2014, at 8:53 AM, Renat Akhmerov wrote:
> Take a look at method get_pecan_config() in mistral/api/app.py. It’s where
> you can pass any parameters into pecan app (see a dictionary ‘cfg_dict’
> initi
FYI, the API scaffolding isn’t actually released yet, though I’m planning on
making a pecan release with this in the next week or two.
---
Ryan Petrello
Senior Developer, DreamHost
ryan.petre...@dreamhost.com
On Mar 9, 2014, at 12:10 PM, Devananda van der Veen
wrote:
> For those looking
/Falcon/).
---
Ryan Petrello
Senior Developer, DreamHost
ryan.petre...@dreamhost.com
On Jan 13, 2014, at 9:23 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-01-12 at 19:52 -0800, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
>> On my phone so will be very brief but perhaps the extensions extension
>> could publish t
*type* of the controller attribute. This
could be False, depending on the URL path :)
Important to note is that `state.controller` will be `None` in the `on_route`
hook, because the routing of the path to controller hasn’t actually happened at
that point.
---
Ryan Petrello
Senior Developer
, they give you the
opportunity to hook in security *before* the controller call, but they avoid
the nastiness of parsing the WSGI environ by hand and writing code that
duplicates pecan’s route-to-controller resolution.
---
Ryan Petrello
Senior Developer, DreamHost
ryan.petre...@dreamhost.com
On Jan
Additionally, can anyone here summarize the current status of v3 documentation?
Is there a process I can currently run against Nova to generate a WADL (I want
to make sure the Pecan changes work with it)?
---
Ryan Petrello
Senior Developer, DreamHost
ryan.petre...@dreamhost.com
On Dec 18
Sounds like what I’m hearing is “Let’s see something that uses this (that
works)”? I’ll work on that :)
---
Ryan Petrello
Senior Developer, DreamHost
ryan.petre...@dreamhost.com
On Dec 18, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Ryan Petrello wrote:
> Jamie:
>
> Your approach makes sense, but it still
and
regular-expression style routes).
---
Ryan Petrello
Senior Developer, DreamHost
ryan.petre...@dreamhost.com
On Dec 18, 2013, at 6:05 AM, Jamie Lennox wrote:
> I attempted this in keystone as part of a very simple extension [1]. I
> understand that it is a much simpler case but nesti
So any additional feedback on this patch? I’d love to start working on porting
some of the other extensions to pecan, but want to make sure I’ve got approval
on this approach first.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/61303/7
---
Ryan Petrello
Senior Developer, DreamHost
ryan.petre
Unless there’s some other trickiness going on that I’m unaware of, the routes
for the WSGI app are defined at application startup time (by methods called in
the WSGI app’s __init__).
---
Ryan Petrello
Senior Developer, DreamHost
ryan.petre...@dreamhost.com
On Dec 13, 2013, at 12:56 PM, Doug
pecan implementation. Is the goal
to deserialize the request *body* from e.g., XML into a usable data structure?
Is there an equivalent for JSON handling? How does this relate to the schema
validation that’s being done in v3?
---
Ryan Petrello
Senior Developer, DreamHost
ryan.petre...@dreamhos
called down the
line).
When you involve Tempest, though, you’re generally pointing at a real HTTP
server and testing for correctness, so using HTTP here makes sense (imo).
---
Ryan Petrello
Senior Developer, DreamHost
ryan.petre...@dreamhost.com
On Dec 10, 2013, at 4:12 PM, Russell Bryant
just fine for both.
---
Ryan Petrello
Senior Developer, DreamHost
ryan.petre...@dreamhost.com
On Nov 7, 2013, at 7:02 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 11/07/2013 06:41 PM, Adrian Otto wrote:
>> Solum Team,
>>
>> First of all I wanted to say that I have been thinking a lot about
in the #pecanpy IRC channel on Freenode or send an
email to openstack-...@lists.launchpad.net with "[Pecan]" in the subject.
---
Ryan Petrello
Senior Developer, DreamHost
ryan.petre...@dreamhost.com
___
OpenStack-dev mailing lis
Endre,
Pecan's RestController doesn't seem to provide support for an explicit `patch`
method in the manner you're attempting to use it:
http://pecan.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rest.html#url-mapping
On Jul 29, 2013, at 6:32 AM, Endre Karlson wrote:
> What am I doing wrong here?
>
> doing
>
>
28 matches
Mail list logo
