Hi Eugene,
I dig into few medium priority bugs yesterday and today. Have added
comments there. I started from the bottom in the list at etherpad. I will
continue to go in the reverse order on daily basis as and when I get time.
Let me know if you need any specific help wrt this. ping me on irc (rms
Hi,
Following a very interesting and vocal thread on GBP for last couple of
days and the GBP meeting today, GBP sub-team proposes following name
changes to the resource.
policy-point for endpoint
policy-group for endpointgroup (epg)
Please reply if you feel that it is not ok with reason and sugg
We have diverged our attention towards nova-network-> neutron parity on
this thread unnecessarily.
Can we discuss and collectively decide on what is the way forward for GBP
in Juno release?
Efforts have been made by the subteam starting from throwing PoC at last
summit to spec approval to code re
Hi all,
Towards the end of the SAD one of my spec (
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104378/) did not make it on Sunday;
understandably because there were flurry of specs getting reviewed in
burst.
I would like to ask cores to take a look at this very basic change and see
if it can be made in. Ple
Hi Vikash,
Currently this is not supported. the NIC not only needs to be in different
subnet, they have to be in different network as well (container for the
subnet)
Thanks
Ronak
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Vikash Kumar <
vikash.ku...@oneconvergence.com> wrote:
> *With 'interfaces' I mean '
Hi,
While running a testr on test_routers I noticed failure of test cases that
involved "enable_snat" attribute.
As per neutron code, this attribute is only added to router if the plugin
supports ext-gw-mode extensions.
If a plugin does not support this extension, shouldnt it be skipping the
test
I like the proposal and I share the pain of checking for the important
emails in the pile of all and potentially missing on some in timely fashion.
My 2 cents on top of creating an automated rule:
Most of the people (not all) I see on dev-list are active on either 1 or 2
project specific discussio
Hi Rudra,
Please see inline:
Thanks,
Ronak
> --
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 18:25:15 +
> From: Rudra Rugge
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
>
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Extraroute and router extensions
> Message-ID: <172af81c
Hi,
If a plugin has its own extension, what is the correct way to set
api_extensions_path.
I can see at multiple places that the practice is this:
api_extensions_path=neutron//extensions/
But if you do that problem mentioned in the following bug starts appearing.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutr
Hi,
I can see on following link that many of the latest code reviews are
reporting build failure at the same point?
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/python-neutronclient,n,z
The backtrace looks liike:
ft46.1: tests.unit.test_shell.ShellTest.test_auth_StringExceptio
10 matches
Mail list logo
