anks
Rohit
On 10/28/14 2:50 PM, "Carl Baldwin" wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Rohit Agarwalla (roagarwa)
> wrote:
>> Agreed. The way I'm thinking about this is that tenants shouldn't care
>>what
>> the underlying implementation is - L2 or L
I have also started to capture some of our discussions here.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RoutedNetworking
Thanks
Rohit
On 10/29/14 1:32 AM, "Cory Benfield" wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 20:01:40, Kevin Benton wrote:
>> I think the simplest use case is just that a provider doesn't want t
r everyone interested.
Thanks
Rohit
On 10/27/14 2:20 AM, "Cory Benfield" wrote:
>On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 19:05:43, Rohit Agarwalla (roagarwa) wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I'm interested as well in this model. Curious to understand the routing
>> filters and the
Agreed. The way I'm thinking about this is that tenants shouldn't care what the
underlying implementation is - L2 or L3. As long as the connectivity
requirements are met using the model/API, end users should be fine.
The data center network design should be an administrators decision based on
th
Hi
I'm interested as well in this model. Curious to understand the routing filters
and their implementation that will enable isolation between tenant networks.
Also, having a BoF session on "Virtual Networking using L3" may be useful to
get all interested folks together at the Summit.
Thanks
R
