Hello,
Just a quick note to mention that I just updated the subteam wiki page with
a proposed definition of what NFV means. Comments and updates are of
course welcome.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Teams/NFV#What_is_NFV.3F
Cheers,
--
Nicolas Barcet
a.k.a. nijaba, nick
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Nicolas Barcet wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot for the comments so far. Please see bellow an updated
version trying to integrate the remarks. I have created an Etherpad for
this [1] so that we can jointly update it.
>
> ---
> Mission statement for the OpenSta
gt;
> Our team have 3rd party CI test for PCI pass-through and OAT trusted
> computing, which can’t be achieved through CI now. These tests are based
> on real hardware environment instead of VM. We didn’t publish result yet
> because of some IT logistic support.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
&
Hello,
As promised during the second BoF session (thanks a lot to Chris Wright for
leading this), here is a first try at defining the purpose of our special
interest group.
---
Mission statement for the OpenStack NFV Special Interest Group:
The SIG aims to define and prioritize the use cases whi
penStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
--
Nicolas Barcet
a.k.a. nijaba, nick
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> > Please Julien correct me if I'm wrong. And maybe Ceilometer has
> > recommendations for production deployment and I just missed it?
>
> There's no recommendation per-say, except what we added on the
> documentation so far.
For reference,
much in itself.
Binary instances of agents written using the framework would be what could
be eventually deployed via cloud-init on a case by case basis.
Wdyt?
Nick
--
Nicolas Barcet
a.k.a. nijaba, nick
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@
Dear TC members,
Our companies are actively encouraging our respective customers to have the
patches they mission us to make be contributed back upstream. In order to
encourage this behavior from them and others, it would be nice that if
could gain some visibility as "sponsors" of the patches in
+1
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Lu, Lianhao http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>>
wrote:
>* +1*>**>* -Lianhao*>**>* Angus Salkeld wrote on 2013-07-31:*>* > On 31/07/13
>10:56 +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:*>* >> Hi,*>* >>*>* >> I'd like to propose to
>add Mehdi A
