k Development Mailing List
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Cc: Anne Gentle
mailto:annegen...@justwriteclick.com>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Questions about plans for heat wadls moving
forward
On 09/13/2013 01:21 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
On Fri, S
in the API reference page. David Cramer's aware
of the problem and will work through it.
We also had a breakthrough where we can now link to WADL files in separate
repositories so we have a single source of truth. Thanks to Mike Asthalter for
testing! He reported that you can use this syntax in
:
"openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Questions about plans for heat wadls moving
forward
On 09/18/2013 08:09 AM, Mike Asthalter wrote:
We were successful yesterday in
k Development Mailing List
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Questions about plans for heat wadls moving
forward
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Mike Asthalter
mailto:mike.asthal...@rackspace.com>> wrote:
Hi Anne,
I want to make sure
lto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Questions about plans for heat wadls moving
forward
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Mike Asthalter
mailto:mike.asthal...@rackspace.com>> wrote:
Hi Anne,
I want to make sure I've understood the ramifications of you
wrote:
On 09/12/2013 04:33 PM, Steve Baker wrote:
> On 09/13/2013 08:28 AM, Mike Asthalter wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Can someone please explain the plans for our 2 wadls moving forward:
>>
>> * wadl in original heat
>> repo:
>> https://github.com/
Hello,
Can someone please explain the plans for our 2 wadls moving forward:
* wadl in original heat repo:
https://github.com/openstack/heat/blob/master/doc/docbkx/api-ref/src/wadls/heat-api/src/heat-api-1.0.wadl<%22https://github.com/openstack/heat/blob/master/doc/docbkx/api-ref/src/wadls/he
