Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][glance][osc][sdk] Image Encryption for OpenStack (proposal)

2018-10-15 Thread Matthew Oliver
Just an FYI, it doesn't solved cached images, but Swift does support at rest encryption, so if using the Swift store backend you can at least know your image on disk on the storage nodes would be safe. We still need to add more functionality like key rotation, but we do integrate with kmip sevices

[openstack-dev] [First Contact] [SIG] [PTL] Project Liaisons - Please update list

2018-08-14 Thread Matthew Oliver
Greetings new and continuing PTLs! Now that the PTL elections are over may I ask those of you who haven't done so already to head on over to the First Contact SIG Project Liaison list [0] and make sure you details, especially timezone has been filled out? We of the First Contact SIG are striving

Re: [openstack-dev] [First Contact][SIG] Weekly Meeting

2018-03-15 Thread Matthew Oliver
sorry I missed the meeting, I've been off with family related gastro fun, fun times... first me and then the pregnant wife which means spending the whole morning yesterday in hostpital re-hydrating the wife, just as a precaution to keep the baby safe. good news was the toddler wasn't hit as bad as

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Dublin PTG schedule up

2018-02-02 Thread Matthew Oliver
Ahh makes sense. Thanks Thierry, I can tell this isn't your first Rodeo :) Matt On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 7:52 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Matthew Oliver wrote: > > Sweet thanks Thierry, > > > > Only issue is I see what days things are happening, but not what rooms >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Dublin PTG schedule up

2018-02-01 Thread Matthew Oliver
Sweet thanks Thierry, Only issue is I see what days things are happening, but not what rooms things are in. Unless I'm failing at reading a table. Matt On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 8:02 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Hi everyone, > > The schedule for the Dublin PTG is now posted on the PTG website: > h

Re: [openstack-dev] [First Contact] [SIG] Presence at the PTG

2017-12-14 Thread Matthew Oliver
Sounds great.. Still haven't got a green light from my employer whether they'd send me or not yet tho. But if I can get to the PTG I'll be there :) Matt On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Kendall Nelson wrote: > Yeah that should be doable :) > > As we get a little closer, I can draft an agenda a

Re: [openstack-dev] [First Contact] [OUI] Call for Project Liaisons

2017-12-12 Thread Matthew Oliver
1, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Kendall Nelson > wrote: > >> Thank you Matt! >> >> To clarify, you want to be Project Liaison for sSwift? Or a member of the >> SIG? Or both? :) >> >> -Kendall (diablo_rojo) >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 2

Re: [openstack-dev] [First Contact] [OUI] Call for Project Liaisons

2017-12-11 Thread Matthew Oliver
I'll put my hand up for my timezone. Especially as interest in my side of the world grows I'd love to make sure there is someone available. Project: Swift Name: Matthew Oliver IRC: mattolverau email: m...@oliver.net.au timezone: UTC +11 (AEDT) Matt On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 8:25 A

Re: [openstack-dev] [storlets][mascot] mascot for the storlets project

2017-04-24 Thread Matthew Oliver
Looks cool, I'd stick it on my laptop :) On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 4:43 PM, wrote: > +1 > > Looks so nice to me! > > Thanks for the great illustration, Heidi! > > > > > > Thank you, > > Takashi > > > > *From:* Eran Rom [mailto:e...@itsonlyme.name] > *Sent:* Monday, April 24, 2017 2:35 AM > *To:* O

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Can we stop global requirements update?

2017-04-19 Thread Matthew Oliver
We have started this work. I've been working on: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/444718/ Which will do requirement checks, as specified in the Pike PTG ehterpad for Tuesday morning: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/relmgt-stable-requirements-ptg-pike (line 40+). Once done, Tony and I were going

Re: [openstack-dev] [swift] limit/marker/count behavior when limit not given

2016-12-18 Thread Matthew Oliver
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > Hey all, > > In the docs for listing containers: > > http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/object-storage/? > expanded=show-account-details-and-list-containers-detail > > it says that limit is optional. However, if you give it > full_listin

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][FFE] oslosphinx

2016-09-04 Thread Matthew Oliver
Thanks Tony, Yup that's my understanding too. Like you said, thanks to the upper-constraints having the correct version (4.7.0), and the fact that currently the swiftclient has oslosphinx unconstrained, means that the online documentation builds OK and the docs job passes in the gate. Further, an

Re: [openstack-dev] [swift] zones and partition

2016-02-21 Thread Matthew Oliver
Kiru, That just means you have put even weight on all your drives, so your telling swift to store it that way. So short answer is there is more to it then that. Sure evenly balanced makes life easier. But it doesn't have to be the case. You can set drive weights and overload factor to tune/balan

Re: [openstack-dev] [Swift] Meeting time change

2015-05-26 Thread Matthew Oliver
+1 to what Kota said! Matt On May 27, 2015 11:39 AM, "Kota TSUYUZAKI" wrote: > Thanks John and all swifters for taking care of Asian Pasific and > Australian time zone. Much appreciated :) > > Kota > > (2015/05/26 4:32), John Dickinson wrote: > > Based on discussion over at the summit and over

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] policy on old / virtually abandoned patches

2014-12-05 Thread Matthew Oliver
I have a script that does 95% of what you want: https://github.com/matthewoliver/swift_abandon_notifier We are using it for swift reviews. At the moment the only thing it doesn't do is actually abandon, it instead sends a warning email and waits n days (2 weeks by default) for action, if it still

Re: [openstack-dev] [swift] Allow hostname for nodes in Ring

2014-10-14 Thread Matthew Oliver
Hey Hisashi , It does indeed look abandoned. So if you want to take it over sure that's OK :) 1) It isn't a bug, so no bug report is needed. You could raise a BP if you wanted, jump on the freenode #openstack-swift channel if you want to discuss. 2) You can do one of two things: - Continue whe

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Bringing back auto-abandon (was: Review metrics - what do we want to measure?)

2014-09-10 Thread Matthew Oliver
Hey all, I have written a abandon notifier script for swift. The idea is it does a gerrit query for changes that haven't been updated for 4 weeks, has a negative score and isn't WIP. It then sends an email notification warning the owner that the change is being considered as an abandoned change an

Re: [openstack-dev] [ALL] Removing the tox==1.6.1 pin

2014-07-25 Thread Matthew Oliver
Just tested tox 1.7.2 with swift on my Dev box and tox -epy27 runs fine. So seems Swift isn't affected by this. Matt On Jul 26, 2014 7:44 AM, "Clark Boylan" wrote: > Hello, > > The recent release of tox 1.7.2 has fixed the {posargs} interpolation > issues we had with newer tox which forced us

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Solum][Mistral] New class of requirements for Stackforge projects

2014-06-25 Thread Matthew Oliver
On Jun 26, 2014 12:12 PM, "Angus Salkeld" wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 25/06/14 15:13, Clark Boylan wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Adrian Otto wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> Solum has run into a constraint with the current scheme for requirements ma

Re: [openstack-dev] [Swift] Swift 2.0 release candidate

2014-06-22 Thread Matthew Oliver
Nice work swift devs! Storage policies were a great idea and now they exist! Awesome work! Matt On Jun 23, 2014 2:04 PM, "John Dickinson" wrote: > Through extensive work from the entirety of the Swift dev team over the > past year, storage policies have landed in Swift. Last Friday, we merged

Re: [openstack-dev] How to re-compile Devstack Code

2014-04-23 Thread Matthew Oliver
If you put OFFLINE=True in your localrc (or local.conf) file, then you can: ./unstack.sh; ./stack.sh without the stack.sh attempting to recheck out the latest code. Matt On Apr 24, 2014 3:49 PM, "shiva m" wrote: > Hi, > > I have Devstack havana setup on Ubuntu 13.10. I am trying to modify some >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Meeting time redux

2014-04-23 Thread Matthew Oliver
Seeing as its a global project, there will never be a great time. Alternating in nice, but that has the potential for someone missing important events for having their say cause they may just wait to the next more convenient meeting. We could have meetings based off where most contributors are, bu