Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][scenario] independece test between Stack and backing services?

2014-04-02 Thread Martina Kollarova
st implementation of Daas - Destruction as a Service. Martina Do you think this would be an interesting evolution of destroystack, or is that different enough in goals that we should think about this problem separately. -Sean On 04/02/2014 08:55 AM, Martina Kollarova wrote: Hi Sean

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][scenario] independece test between Stack and backing services?

2014-04-02 Thread Martina Kollarova
Hi Sean, I'm already working on something similar. What I'm trying to do is not a service, but a set of tests that would be able to run commands on the nodes and restart services, kill disks, etc. The basic idea is to inject some fault, see if everything still works as expected and restore th

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Communicating test plans

2013-09-18 Thread Martina Kollarova
On Wed 18 Sep 2013 12:34:46 PM CEST, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: On 09/18/2013 03:37 PM, Martina Kollarova wrote: There is a lack of design documentation and specification in the blueprints, creating test plans is problematic and requires a lot of communication with the developers. I was

[openstack-dev] [QA] Communicating test plans

2013-09-18 Thread Martina Kollarova
't support formatting, but we can link them there. Are there perhaps some better solutions for this? Would it be worth our time to try this? [1] https://github.com/mkollaro/openstack-testplans Martina Kollarova -- irc: mkollaro ___ OpenStack-d

[openstack-dev] Gerrit's Jenkins should stop running tests after first failure

2013-06-18 Thread Martina Kollarova
Jenkins keeps running all the tests, even if the basic pep8 test fails, and runs all of the (very slow) Tempest Quantum tests, even though almost all of them are failing. I propose that it should fail and stop all of the other tests once there is a failure in a voting test. For non-voting test