Hi Greg,
Only the tests listed in the Guidelines are required to pass to get an
OpenStack Powered logo and trademark usage license from the OpenStack
Foundation (you must also use the designated sections of upstream code
specified in the Guideline documents). However vendors are strongly encou
Hi Everyone,
Happy Friday! There have been a number of discussions (at the PTG, at
OpenStack Summit, in Interop WG and Board of Directors meetings, etc) over the
past several months about the possibility of creating new interoperability
programs in addition to the existing OpenStack Powered pr
> On Mar 1, 2017, at 6:01 PM, Rodrigo Duarte wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
> During the PTG, Morgan mentioned that there was the possibility of keystone
> removing the v2.0 API [0]. This thread is a follow up from that discussion to
> make sure we loop in t
I work with lots of different clouds and any time I switch focus to a terminal
I have to figure out which cloud it’s environment is set up to use. My
terminal emulator has the same color scheme as my IRC client, so I’ve probably
typed “set | grep OS_” into IRC accidentally about a million times
>
> On Sep 8, 2016, at 3:11 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
>
> On 09/08/2016 09:04 AM, Andrew Laski wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016, at 07:18 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
>>> On 09/07/2016 07:34 PM, Andrew Laski wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016, at 06:54 PM, Martin Millnert wrote:
> On Thu,
[echoing what I just said on the openstack-operators ML since they just
announced an Ops Midcycle in NYC also on the 25th and 26th]
Hi Folks,
FYI for those that may not be aware, that’s also the week of OpenStack East.
OpenStack East runs August 23-24 also in New York City at the Playstation
> On Jun 20, 2016, at 8:46 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Mark Voelker's message of 2016-06-16 20:33:36 +:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 05:42:16PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I don't think DefCore actually needs to change old versions of Tempest,
>>> but maybe Chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Jun 16, 2016, at 2:25 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 02:15:47PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Matthew Treinish's message of 2016-06-16 13:56:31 -0400:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:59:41PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wro
> On Jun 15, 2016, at 8:01 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
>
> On 06/15/2016 12:14 AM, Mark Voelker wrote:
>
>>
>> It is perhaps important to note here that the DefCore seems to have two
>> meanings to a lot of people I talk to today: it’s a mark of interoperability
&
On Jun 14, 2016, at 7:28 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>
> On 06/14/2016 05:42 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> Excerpts from Matthew Treinish's message of 2016-06-14 15:12:45 -0400:
>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 02:41:10PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Matthew Treinish's message of 2016-06-1
Hi Everyone,
At today’s DefCore Committee meeting, we discussed a couple of newly-approved
TC resolutions and wanted to take a quick moment to make folks aware of them in
case they weren’t already. These new resolutions may impact what capabilities
and tests projects ask to have included in fu
> On Jun 1, 2016, at 12:27 PM, Armando M. wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1 June 2016 at 02:28, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Armando M. wrote:
> Having looked at the recent commit volume that has been going into the
> *-aas repos, I am considering changing the release model for
> neutron-vpnaas, neutron-fwaas,
[+defcore-committee]
This depends a little on what your objective is. If you’re looking for the
tests that a product must pass today if it wants an OpenStack Powered
logo/trademark agreement, you’ll want to look at either of the two most
recently-approved DefCore Guidelines (currently 2015.5 a
On Nov 4, 2015, at 4:41 PM, Gregory Haynes wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-11-04 21:17:15 +:
>> Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2015-11-04 12:57:53 -0800:
>>> Ed Leafe wrote:
On Nov 3, 2015, at 6:45 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Here's a Devstack revi
Mark T. Voelker
> On Sep 29, 2015, at 12:36 PM, Matt Fischer wrote:
>
>
>
> I agree with John Griffith. I don't have any empirical evidences to back
> my "feelings" on that one but it's true that we weren't enable to enable
> Cinder v2 until now.
>
> Which makes me wonder: When can we actu
FWIW, the most popular client libraries in the last user survey[1] other than
OpenStack’s own clients were: libcloud (48 respondents), jClouds (36
respondents), Fog (34 respondents), php-opencloud (21 respondents), DeltaCloud
(which has been retired by Apache and hasn’t seen a commit in two year
On Sep 28, 2015, at 9:03 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
> Excerpts from John Garbutt's message of 2015-09-28 12:32:53 +0100:
>> On 28 September 2015 at 12:10, Sean Dague wrote:
>>> On 09/27/2015 08:43 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Mark Voelker's message of 2015-09-25 20:43:23 +:
>>
On Sep 25, 2015, at 1:56 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Mark Voelker's message of 2015-09-25 17:42:24 +:
>> On Sep 25, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Brian Rosmaita
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd like to clarify something.
>>>
>>
On Sep 25, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Brian Rosmaita
wrote:
>
> I'd like to clarify something.
>
> On 9/25/15, 12:16 PM, "Mark Voelker" wrote:
> [big snip]
>> Also worth pointing out here: when we talk about ³doing the same thing²
>> from a DefCore perspecti
On Sep 25, 2015, at 12:00 PM, Chris Hoge wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 25, 2015, at 6:59 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>
>> Excerpts from Mark Voelker's message of 2015-09-25 01:20:04 +:
On Sep 24, 2015, at 5:55 PM, Sabari Murugesan
wrote:
Hi Melanie
In general,
On Sep 25, 2015, at 10:42 AM, Andrew Laski wrote:
>
> On 09/25/15 at 09:59am, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> Excerpts from Mark Voelker's message of 2015-09-25 01:20:04 +:
>>> >
>>> > On Sep 24, 2015, at 5:55 PM, Sabari Murugesan
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi Melanie
>>> >
>>> > In general, images c
>
> On Sep 24, 2015, at 5:55 PM, Sabari Murugesan wrote:
>
> Hi Melanie
>
> In general, images created by glance v1 API should be accessible using v2 and
> vice-versa. We fixed some bugs [1] [2] [3] where metadata associated with an
> image was
> causing incompatibility. These fixes were back-
As another data point, I took a poke around the OpenStack Marketplace [1] this
morning and found:
* 1 distro/appliance claims v1 support
* 3 managed services claim v1 support
* 3 public clouds claim v1 support
And everyone else claims v2 support. I’d encourage vendors to check their
Marketplac
On Aug 3, 2015, at 6:09 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>
> On 03/08/15 19:48 +0200, Gorka Eguileor wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 03:42:48PM +, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
>>> I'm usually for abstraction layers, but they don't always pay off very well
>>> due to catering to the lowest common denominat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Aug 3, 2015, at 6:09 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 03/08/15 19:48 +0200, Gorka Eguileor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 03:42:48PM +, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
I'm usually for abstraction layers, but they don't always pay off very well due
to cater
Inline…
On Mar 27, 2015, at 11:48 AM, Assaf Muller wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> On 03/27/2015 05:22 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>>
>>> Part of it is corner (or simplified) use cases not being optimally
>>> served by Neutron, and I think Neutron could more aggressively address
>
Hi John,
I’m not visually impaired myself, but have you taken a look at Gertty? It’s a
console-based interface so you may be able to take advantage of other console
customizations you’ve made (font sizing for example) and it has options that
allow you to set color palettes (e.g. to increase co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
The voice of operators/users/deployers in this conversation should be reflected
through the entity that they are paying to provide operational cloud services.
Let’s be careful here: I hope you didn’t mean to say that
operators/users/deployers vo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
The sentiment that Kevin is expressing here has come up informally at past
Operator’s meetups as well, which makes sense given that relatively few
operators are chasing trunk vs using a stable rele
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
If the problem is too many round trips our the interaction being too chatty
This is a good point: is the main issue that we feel the interaction is too
chatty, or that it’s too slow? I seem to hear people gravitating toward one or
the other when
30 matches
Mail list logo