Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][devstack][all] ZooKeeper vs etcd for Tooz/DLM

2017-03-15 Thread Louis Taylor
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15 2017, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > >> Yep, jd__ and i confirmed that things work with 3.x > > Though to be clear, what's used in tooz is the v2 HTTP API, not the new > v3 gRPC API. And just to be double clear: although etcd 3.x c

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] revising the core list

2017-02-17 Thread Louis Taylor
in as Glance contributors: > - Kairat Kushaev > - Mike Fedosin > - Louis Taylor So long, and thanks for all the images! __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ..

Re: [openstack-dev] The #openstack-packaging channel requires an invite?

2016-03-09 Thread Louis Taylor
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Someone showed up in the -stable channel this morning asking for help with > packaging. I gather they were there because the IRC wiki [1] says the > #openstack-stable channel is also for packaging discussions, given -stable > originated from

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][release][all] Automatic .ics generation for OpenStack's and project's deadlines

2015-12-23 Thread Louis Taylor
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > What you have is a really good start. Thanks for working on this! > How do you feel about importing the repository into gerrit? > > A couple of things I'd like to see added: > > 1. Separate sections for cross-project and project-specific even

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][release][all] Automatic .ics generation for OpenStack's and project's deadlines

2015-12-13 Thread Louis Taylor
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 06:20:44PM +, Flavio Percoco wrote: > Greetings, > > I'd like to explore the possibility of having .ics generated - pretty > much the same way we generate it for irc-meetings - for the OpenStack > release schedule and project's deadlines. I believe just 1 calendar > wou

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Add Ian Cordasco back into glance-core

2015-12-07 Thread Louis Taylor
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:06:03PM -0430, Flavio Percoco wrote: > Greetings, > > Not long ago, Ian Cordasco, sent an email out stepping down from his > core roles as he didn't have the time to dedicate to the project > team's he was part of. > > Ian has contacted me mentioning that he's gotten cl

Re: [openstack-dev] [All][Glance Mitaka Priorities

2015-11-06 Thread Louis Taylor
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 06:31:23PM +, Bhandaru, Malini K wrote: > Hello Glance Team/Flavio > > Would you please provide link to Glance priorities at > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Design_Summit/Mitaka/Etherpads#Glance > > [ Malini] Regards > Malini I don't belive there was an etherpad fo

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] new change management tools and processes for stable/liberty and mitaka

2015-11-04 Thread Louis Taylor
On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 03:03:29PM +1300, Fei Long Wang wrote: > Hi Doug, > > Thanks for posting this. I'm working on this for Zaqar now and there is a > question. As for the stable/liberty patch, where does the "60fdcaba00e30d02" > in [1] come from? Thanks. > > [1] > https://review.openstack.or

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Removing python-swiftclient from requirements.txt

2015-07-29 Thread Louis Taylor
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 07:55:54PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > I replied on both patches, but I'll repeat it here for a broader > audience: > > Please set up an "extras" entry for each backend instead of just > removing the dependencies. That will signal to users that you know > what dependenci

[openstack-dev] [glance] Removal of Catalog Index Service from Glance

2015-07-27 Thread Louis Taylor
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 07:50:55PM +0100, Louis Taylor wrote: > Hi operators, > > In Kilo, we added the Catalog Index Service as an experimental API in Glance. > It soon became apparent this would be better suited as a separate project, so > it was split into the Sear

Re: [openstack-dev] 7/17 state of the gate (you know, fires)

2015-07-18 Thread Louis Taylor
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 07:51:35PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > We started the day with a mock 1.1.4 release breaking unit tests for a few > projects (nova, cinder, ironic at least). > > The nova blocker was tracked with bug 1475661. > > We got a g-r change up to block mock!=1.1.4 but that didn

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Progress of the Python 3 port

2015-07-16 Thread Louis Taylor
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:39:11AM +0200, Victor Stinner wrote: > Hi, > Any update on this release? This has now been released in glance_store 0.7.0 Cheers, Louis signature.asc Description: Digital signature __ OpenStack De

Re: [openstack-dev] Why doesn't Gerrit email me?

2015-06-30 Thread Louis Taylor
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 02:08:45PM +0100, Neil Jerram wrote: > Apologies if this is an FAQ - I tried a quick search, but that didn't find > anything that looked both up to date and authoritative. > > I keep going back to Gerrit jobs that I've reviewed or commented on, and > finding that there have

Re: [openstack-dev] [Security][Glance] Design session for image signing/encryption

2015-05-19 Thread Louis Taylor
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 03:01:39PM +, Clark, Robert Graham wrote: > Is there a session to discuss the image security proposal? > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/177948/2/specs/liberty/encrypted-and-authenticated-image-support.rst Yes, it's at 4:30 - 5:10pm on Wednesday. Cheers, Louis https:

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][Glance][Heat][Cinder] Removing the CLI tests from Tempest

2015-04-30 Thread Louis Taylor
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:28:15PM -0400, Matthew Treinish wrote: > We're now at the end of the cycle and there are 3 clients that still have CLI > tests in tempest. I have pushed the patch up to remove all these tests here: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/178757/ Hi Matt, This is being wo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Last day to elect your PTL!

2015-04-16 Thread Louis Taylor
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 02:55:20PM -0400, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: > Just a quick reminder that elections are closing soon, if you haven't > already you should use your right to vote and pick your favourite candidate! Also remember to make sure you voted using the second vote link you were sent (a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Proposal to change Glance meeting time.

2015-03-11 Thread Louis Taylor
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 02:25:26PM +, Ian Cordasco wrote: > I have no opinions on the matter. Either 1400 or 1500 work for me. I think > there are a lot of people asking for it to be at 1500 instead though. > Would anyone object to changing it to 1500 instead (as long as it is one > consistent

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Proposal to change Glance meeting time.

2015-03-08 Thread Louis Taylor
On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 08:07:33PM +, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > So, the new proposal is: > > Glance meetings [1] to be conducted weekly on Thursdays at 1400UTC [2] on > #openstack-meeting-4 +1 It was nice to try out the alternating meeting times. However, I don't think it brought many benefit

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-04 Thread Louis Taylor
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 07:38:42AM -0430, Flavio Percoco wrote: > I'm sorry but no. I don't think there's anything that requires extra > patience than 2 (or even more) cycles without provaiding reviews or > even any kind of active contribution. > > I personally don't think adding new cores without

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Cleanout of inactive change proposals from review

2015-02-13 Thread Louis Taylor
Erno Kuvaja wrote: > We have almost year old (from last update) reviews still in the queue > for glance. The discussion was initiated on yesterday's meeting for > adopting abandon policy for stale changes. I'm okay with abandoning old some old reviews which are obviously going nowhere, such as one

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Why are we continuing to add new namespaced oslo libs?

2015-01-23 Thread Louis Taylor
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 01:48:32AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > I've just noticed that oslo.log made it to global-requirements.txt 9 > days ago. How come are we still adding some name.spaced oslo libs? > Wasn't the outcome of the discussion in Paris that we shouldn't do that > anymore, and that w

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging

2015-01-13 Thread Louis Taylor
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:54:13AM -0700, John Griffith wrote: > I'd echo all the points made regarding "logging" shouldn't be a > problem; we're an Open Source project so the idea of our communication > being public making anybody nervous and not wanting to participate > seems really off to me. Y

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging

2015-01-05 Thread Louis Taylor
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 05:42:02AM -0600, Cindy Pallares wrote: > I would like to re-open the discussion on IRC logging for the glance > channel. It was discussed on a meeting back in November[1], but it didn't > seem to have a lot of input from the community and it was not discussed in > the maili

Re: [openstack-dev] Git client vulnerability

2014-12-19 Thread Louis Taylor
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 01:19:48PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > Please re-read that advisory[1]. GitHub's _servers_ were not > affected as this is a client-side vulnerability. What GitHub did was > release fixed versions of their "GitHub for Windows" and "GitHub for > Mac" _client_ tools. Github

Re: [openstack-dev] How to get openstack bugs data for research?

2014-12-03 Thread Louis Taylor
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 08:20:45PM +0800, zfx0...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi, all > > I am a graduate student in Peking University, our lab do some research on > open source projects. > This is our introduction: https://passion-lab.org/ > > Now we need openstack issues data for research, I found the

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Deprecating osprofiler option 'enabled' in favour of 'profiler_enabled'

2014-12-02 Thread Louis Taylor
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 12:16:44PM +0800, Zhi Yan Liu wrote: > Why not change other services instead of glance? I see one reason is > "glance is the only one service use this option name", but to me one > reason to keep it as-it in glance is that original name makes more > sense due to the option a

[openstack-dev] [glance] Deprecating osprofiler option 'enabled' in favour of 'profiler_enabled'

2014-12-01 Thread Louis Taylor
Hi all, In order to enable or disable osprofiler in Glance, we currently have an option: [profiler] # If False fully disable profiling feature. enabled = False However, all other services with osprofiler integration use a similar option named profiler_enabled. For consistency, I'm p

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal new hacking rules

2014-11-26 Thread Louis Taylor
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 08:54:35AM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: > It's not about an equality condition. > > It's about the message that is produced by testtools.TestCase.assertEqual(), > and the helpfulness of that message when the order of the arguments is > reversed. > > This is especially true with

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] fix latency on requirements breakage

2014-11-18 Thread Louis Taylor
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 09:32:21PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: > I think this idea has come up before, the problem is knowing how to > distinguish the sky is falling type bugs from other race bugs we know about. > Thinking out loud it could be severity of the bug in launchpad but we have a > lot o

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] fix latency on requirements breakage

2014-11-17 Thread Louis Taylor
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:46:38AM +1030, Christopher Yeoh wrote: > Maybe a MOTD at the top of http://review.openstack.org could help here? Have > a button that the QA/infra people can hit when everything is broken that puts > up a message there asking people to stop rechecking/submitting patches.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Translation technical debt

2014-11-11 Thread Louis Taylor
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 01:46:34PM +, Gary Kotton wrote: > In order to enforce our translation policies - > http://docs.openstack.org/developer/oslo.i18n/guidelines.html - we have added > a hacking rule in Neutron. If you wish to jump aboard this effort then please > let me know. There are patc

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Poll for change in weekly meeting time.

2014-10-31 Thread Louis Taylor
Thanks for bringing this up, Nikhil. On Fri, Oct 31, 2014, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > Here's a poll [0] to find what time-slots work best for everyone as well as > for the interest to remove the alternating time-slot aspect in the schedule. Could this poll be expanded with a wider range of times? I'

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][QA] python-glanceclient untestable in Python 3.4

2014-10-17 Thread Louis Taylor
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 03:01:22PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > Gah! You'd think *I* would know better at this point--sorry about > that... I've now opened https://launchpad.net/bugs/1382582 to track > this. Thanks for any assistance you're able to provide! This looks like a continuation of the

Re: [openstack-dev] 2 Minute tokens

2014-09-30 Thread Louis Taylor
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:44:51AM -0400, Adam Young wrote: > What are the uses that require long lived tokens? Glance has operations which can take a long time, such as uploading and downloading large images. signature.asc Description: Digital signature _

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Some ideas for micro-version implementation

2014-09-23 Thread Louis Taylor
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 01:32:50PM -0400, Andrew Laski wrote: > I've been thinking along very similar lines, but I don't think each current > API needs to be replaced. I would very much like to see a unified API > project that could be responsible for managing requests to "boot an instance > with

Re: [openstack-dev] znc as a service (was Re: [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?)

2014-09-03 Thread Louis Taylor
Thierry Carrez wrote: > Note that ZNC is not the only IRC proxy out there. Bip is also working > quite well. Note also that an IRC proxy is not the only solution. Using a console IRC client on a server works well for me. Irssi or weechat are both simple to set up. signature.asc Description: Digi