JS*int projects from OpenStack?
On 4/2/14 8:43 AM, "Radomir Dopieralski" wrote:
>On 02/04/14 15:26, Kevin Conway wrote:
>> What licensing issues were brought up that prevent the use of JSLint or
>> JSHint? Both are MIT licensed.
>>
>> Granted, JSLint has
ogle.com/closure/utilities/
> [2] http://google-styleguide.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/javascriptguide.xml
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Ke
loy things this way for
> example:
> - API services can be deployed within Apache server or any other HTTP
> server with WSGI backend (Keystone already can be deployed within Apache);
> - workers can be deployed in any non-HTTP application server, uWSGI
On 2/4/14 12:07 PM, "victor stinner" wrote:
>The purpose of replacing eventlet with asyncio is to get a well defined
>control flow, no more surprising task switching at random points.
I disagree with this. Eventlet and gevent yield the execution context
anytime an IO call is made or the 'sleep(
Denis,
It seems that you are hitting on a couple of points here. 1) You aren't a
fan of the fact that calls to user/db are routed through an extensions
written for mysql. 2) This creates a conflict when a datastore does not
support those calls. I am confused about your solution.
Your suggestion i
>
>Will we be doing more complex things than "every day at some time"? ie,
>does the user base see value in configuring backups every 12th day of
>every other month? I think this is easy to write the schedule code, but i
>fear that it will be hard to build a smarter scheduler that would only
>allow
What is the major motivation not to simply use a glance image named "MySQL
5.5" or "MongoDB 2.4"?
Wouldn't that give service providers all the flexibility they need for
providing different types? For example, I could offer a simple "MySQL"
image that creates a MySQL instance. If all my users use t