Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Ceilometer] Proposed Change to Sensor meter naming in Ceilometer

2014-10-20 Thread Jim Mankovich
s the graphical display of individual platform sensor information. Do you happen to know what some of the use cases are for the current reporting of sensor information? Thanks, Jim On 10/20/2014 11:14 AM, Chris Dent wrote: On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, Jim Mankovich wrote: On 10/20/2014 6:53 AM, Chris

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Ceilometer] Proposed Change to Sensor meter naming in Ceilometer

2014-10-20 Thread Jim Mankovich
On 10/20/2014 6:53 AM, Chris Dent wrote: On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Jim Mankovich wrote: See answers inline. I don't have any concrete answers as to how to deal with some of questions you brought up, but I do have some more detail that may be useful to further the discussion. That seems

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Ceilometer] Proposed Change to Sensor meter naming in Ceilometer

2014-10-17 Thread Jim Mankovich
Chris, See answers inline. I don't have any concrete answers as to how to deal with some of questions you brought up, but I do have some more detail that may be useful to further the discussion. On 10/17/2014 11:03 AM, Chris Dent wrote: On Thu, 16 Oct 2014, Jim Mankovich wrote: What I

[openstack-dev] [Ironic][Ceilometer] Proposed Change to Sensor meter naming in Ceilometer

2014-10-16 Thread Jim Mankovich
ld be specified. I understand that this proposed change is not backward compatible with the existing naming, but I don't really see a good solution that would retain backward compatibility. Any/All Feedback will be appreciated, Jim

[openstack-dev] [Ironic][Ceilometer] IPMI Sensor naming in Ceilometer

2014-10-03 Thread Jim Mankovich
he current naming scheme? Regards, Jim -- --- Jim Mankovich | jm...@hp.com (US Mountain Time) --- ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev