[openstack-dev] [heat][nova] Does Heat support Nova micro versions

Hi, Does heat support os-compute-api-version? Say for example I am using queens but have a use case via heat that requires a API parameter that was capped in the 2.56 microversion. Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Core status

Hi, I have recently transitioned to a new role where I will be working on other parts of OpenStack. Sadly I do not have the necessary cycles to maintain my core responsibilities in the neutron community. Nonetheless I will continue to be involved. Thanks Gary

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Bug status

Hi, It has been a relatively quiet week and not many issues opened. There are a few bugs with IPv6 subnets. Most have missing information and I have asked the reporters for some extra information. Not any blockers are issues that are concerning. Wishing everyone a productive PTG. Thanks Gary ___

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Bug deputy report week August 27 - September 2

Thanks for the update. I have taken the baton from the 2nd. Thankfully last few days have been quite. A luta continua From: Hirofumi Ichihara Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Monday, September 3, 2018 at 11:54 AM To: OpenStack List Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Bug deputy report week August

[openstack-dev] Pycharm license

Hi, I understand that the community has an option to get licenses. Anyone have any information regarding this. Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@list

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Bug deputy

anyone can cover my currently assigned week. Thanks, - James Anziano - Original message - From: Gary Kotton To: OpenStack List Cc: Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Bug deputy Date: Thu, May 17, 2018 1:59 AM Hi, An urgent matter has come up this week. If possible, can someone please

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Bug deputy

Hi, An urgent matter has come up this week. If possible, can someone please replace me. Sorry Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Bug deputy update

Hi, A few minor bugs opened and one critical one - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1771293 Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] How to take over a project?

Hi, You either need one of the ono core team or the neutron release team to add you. FYI - https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/1001,members Thanks Gary From: Sangho Shin Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 5:01 AM To: OpenStack List Subject: [openstack-dev] [opens

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas][fwaas][vmware-nsx] Stable/queens build sphinx docs broken

Maybe we should consider unblocking the stable versions at the moment and then enabling us to address in each project. On 4/16/18, 5:34 PM, "Jeremy Stanley" wrote: On 2018-04-16 10:49:17 + (+0000), Gary Kotton wrote: > We have seen that a number of stable projects th

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas][fwaas][vmware-nsx][ovn] Stable/queens build sphinx docs broken

Hi, Here is an example - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/560893/ Thanks Gary From: Gary Kotton Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Monday, April 16, 2018 at 2:28 PM To: OpenStack List Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas][fwaas][vmware-nsx][ovn] Stable/queens build sphinx docs broken Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas][fwaas][vmware-nsx][ovn] Stable/queens build sphinx docs broken

Hi, OVN too. Things were working on the 12th of April and something has changed since then. Thanks Gary From: Gary Kotton Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Monday, April 16, 2018 at 1:49 PM To: OpenStack List Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas][fwaas][vmware-nsx] Stable/queens build

[openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas][fwaas][vmware-nsx] Stable/queens build sphinx docs broken

Hi, We have seen that a number of stable projects that the sphinx docs is broken. The gate job returns ‘retry limit’. An example of the error is http://logs.openstack.org/22/561522/1/check/build-openstack-sphinx-docs/cd99af8/job-output.txt.gz Does anyone have any idea how to address this? Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][infra] pip vs psutil

ix grenade failures? It looks that e.g. all grenade jobs in neutron are broken currently :/ > Wiadomość napisana przez Gary Kotton w dniu 15.04.2018, o godz. 13:32: > > Hi, > The gate is currently broken with https://launchpad.net/bugs/1763966. https://review.op

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][dynamic routing] RYU Breaks lower constraints

Please see https://review.openstack.org/561443 On 4/16/18, 2:31 AM, "IWAMOTO Toshihiro" wrote: On Sun, 15 Apr 2018 21:02:42 +0900, Gary Kotton wrote: > > [1 ] > [1.1 ] > Hi, > That sounds reasonable. I wonder if the RYU folk can ch

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][dynamic routing] RYU Breaks lower constraints

this is caused by the recent pip change and pip no longer cannot import pip from code. The right solution seems to bump the minimum version of ryu. Thought? http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-March/128939.html Akihiro 2018/04/15 午後6:06 "Gary Kotton" mailto:gkot...@

[openstack-dev] [devstack][infra] pip vs psutil

Hi, The gate is currently broken with https://launchpad.net/bugs/1763966. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/561427/ Can unblock us in the short term. Any other ideas? Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

[openstack-dev] [neutron][dynamic routing] RYU Breaks lower constraints

Hi, It seems like ther RYU import is breaking the project: 2018-04-15 08:41:34.654681 | ubuntu-xenial | b'--- import errors ---\nFailed to import test module: neut

[openstack-dev] [neutron][horizon][l2gw] Unable to create a floating IP

Hi, From Queens onwards we have a issue with horizon and L2GW. We are unable to create a floating IP. This does not occur when using the CLI only via horizon. The error received is ‘Error: User does not have admin privileges: Cannot GET resource for non admin tenant. Neutron server returns reque

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [OVN] Tempest API / Scenario tests and OVN metadata

Hi, There are some tempest tests that check realization of resources on the networking platform and connectivity. Here things are challenging as each networking platform may be more restrictive than the upstream ML2 plugin. My thinking here is that we should leverage the tempest plugins for each

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VMware NSX CI - no longer running?

Hi, Here is an example where the CI has run on a recent patch - yesterday - https://review.openstack.org/557256 Thanks Gary On 3/29/18, 1:04 PM, "melanie witt" wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 10:44:52 +0300, Radoslav Gerganov wrote: > On 28.03.2018 19:07, melanie witt wrote: >> We were

Re: [openstack-dev] Adding Brian Haley to the Neutron Drivers team

+1 From: Miguel Lavalle Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 6:26 PM To: OpenStack List Subject: [openstack-dev] Adding Brian Haley to the Neutron Drivers team Hi Neutrinos, As we all know, the Neutron Drivers team plays a crucial role in helping the community to evolve

[openstack-dev] [requirements][l2gw] Latest requirements

Hi, We have a problem with the l2gw tags. The requirements file indicates that we should be pulling in >=12.0.0 and in fact its pulling networking_l2gw-2016.1.0 Please see http://207.189.188.190/logs/neutron/554292/4/tempest-api-vmware-tvd-t/logs/stack.sh.log.txt.gz#_2018-03-22_08_56_03_905 Thank

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][neutron] Depending on pypi versions

The change will need to be in all of the decomposed projects - http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=install_cmd%20-U&i=nope&files=&repos= Good catch! On 3/19/18, 3:18 PM, "Gary Kotton" wrote: Thanks!! Will check if it now On 3/19/18, 3:15 PM, "Andreas Jaeg

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][neutron] Depending on pypi versions

Thanks!! Will check if it now On 3/19/18, 3:15 PM, "Andreas Jaeger" wrote: On 2018-03-19 14:01, Gary Kotton wrote: > The issue is that since the change below - > https://review.openstack.org/553045 - we are not picking up the latest > neutron master code.

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][neutron] Depending on pypi versions

he global-requirements constraints file, I think it is worth adding a comment in (test-)requirements.txt that the OpenStack CI is overriding the version and uses git. -Thomas Gary Kotton, 2018-03-19 11:25: Hi, The change https://github.com/openstack/requirements/commit/35653e8c5044bff1059f50a82b6

[openstack-dev] [requirements][neutron] Depending on pypi versions

Hi, The change https://github.com/openstack/requirements/commit/35653e8c5044bff1059f50a82b6065176eea has created some issues with decomposed neutron plugins. Let me try and give an example to explain. Say for example a patch landed in neutron master that exposed feature X. Now if a decompos

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sdk] Proposal to migrate neutronclient python bindings to OpenStack SDK

ey are things we would like to avoid. If you and/or boden are interested in implementing so-called "generic network resource" commands in Neutron OSC plugin, I can help the effort (as it speed up neutron CLI deprecation). Akihiro 2018-02-26 13:39 GMT+00:00

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sdk] Proposal to migrate neutronclient python bindings to OpenStack SDK

One of the concerns here is that the openstack client does not enable one to configure extensions that are not part of the core reference architecture. So any external third part that tries to have any etension added will not be able to leverage the openstack client. This is a major pain point.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][l2gw] stable/queens tripleo issues

table/queens, sorry for that. I propose to disable TripleO jobs in stable/queens for l2gw project: https://review.openstack.org/546059 Hopefully that helps! Cheers, On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 11:07 PM, Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> wrote: Hi, At the moment the stable/queens branch is

[openstack-dev] [neutron][l2gw] stable/queens tripleo issues

Hi, At the moment the stable/queens branch is broken due to the tripleo CI test failing [i]. Does anyone have any hints here on what we should look at? I am not sure if this is with ansible/centos… Thanks Gary [i] http://logs.openstack.org/88/543188/2/check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario004-multin

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][neutron-lbaas][octavia] Announcing the deprecation of neutron-lbaas and neutron-lbaas-dashboard

Hi, I have a number of issues with this: 1. I do not think that we should mark this as deprecated until we have a clear and working migration patch. Let me give an example. Say I have a user who is using Pike or Queens and has N LBaaS load balancers up and running. What if we upgrade to T and th

[openstack-dev] [neutron][dynamic-routing] Broken unit tests

Hi, Can cores please look at https://review.openstack.org/543208. We are currently blocked on master and stable/queens with this. Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: opensta

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Bug deputy report

Hi, Things have been relatively quiet. There are two bugs: 1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1743480 - I think that we can leverage tags here so that should address the issue. Would be interesting to know what others thing. 2. https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1743552 - patch in re

[openstack-dev] [infra] Gerrit issues

Hi, Anyone else experience problems accessing gerrit? Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Stepping down from core

Armando, wishing you the best in the future. Forza Juve! From: Hirofumi Ichihara Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 12:28 AM To: OpenStack List Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Stepping down from core Hi Armando, It's been a great pleasure working with you. We

[openstack-dev] [neutron][neutron-dynamic-routing] Floating IP create is broken

Hi, The patch 088e317cd2dd8488feb29a4fa6600227d1810479 has broken floating IP creation. This breaks the dynamic routing gating. I have opened a bug and have posted a patch to address. Thanks Gary __

Re: [openstack-dev] [etsinfv][neutron][gap-09]: No state for subnets

Hi, Can you please elaborate more about the subnet state? FYI - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/APIv2-specification#Subnet Thanks Gary From: "Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)" Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 3:13 PM To: OpenStack List Subject: [opens

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Propose Slawek Kaplonski for Neutron core

+1 Welcome to the team! From: Miguel Lavalle Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 at 9:21 PM To: OpenStack List Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Propose Slawek Kaplonski for Neutron core Hi Neutron Team, I want to nominate Slawek Kaplonski (irc: slaweq) to Neutron co

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] any flow-charts ?

Hi, Please see https://docs.openstack.org/security-guide/networking/architecture.html for a starting point. Thanks Gary From: Guru Desai Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Saturday, November 25, 2017 at 1:00 PM To: OpenStack List Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] any flow-charts ? Hello All, I

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Debug tool

Hi, Out of interest is anyone using this tool? If so can you please let us know. This was marked as deprecated in about 18months ago in favor of a tool that was an idea that never actually materialized. Thanks Gary __ OpenSta

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra] Zuul v3 rollout, the sequel

Hi, At the moment the neutron, neutron-lib and many of the decomposed projects are still failing with the v3. Does this mean that we are broken from the 11th? For the decomposed projects we have a work around to help address this in the short term – need to increase timeout and need a flag from Z

Re: [openstack-dev] Security of Meta-Data

Hi, You can configure the metadata service to be secure. You just need to make sure that nova is configured correctly. FYI - https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/neutron/conf/agent/metadata/config.py#L68 Thanks Gary On 10/4/17, 7:01 AM, "Joshua Harlow" wrote: I would treat the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Update on Zuul v3 Migration - and what to do about issues

We have patches stuck for hours – only info is: http://zuulv3.openstack.org/static/stream.html?uuid=128746a70c1843d7a94e887120ba381c&logfile=console.log At the moment we are unable to do anything On 10/3/17, 3:36 PM, "Boden Russell" wrote: On 10/3/17 5:17 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > > D

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] pypi publishing

On 10/1/17, 9:40 PM, "Paul Belanger" wrote: On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 05:02:00AM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Sat, Sep 30, 2017, at 10:28 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: > > Hi, > > Any idea why latest packages are not being published to pypi. > &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Zull retry limit

Thanks! On 10/1/17, 8:23 PM, "Clark Boylan" wrote: On Sun, Oct 1, 2017, at 10:19 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > Is this an example of the solution that you are proposing - > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/508775/. I also read that we should > create

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Zull retry limit

at, Sep 30, 2017, at 11:23 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > It seems like all patches are hitting this issue – “RETRY_LIMIT in 5m > 35s”. Any idea? Is this specific to vmware-nsx or all projects? > Did we miss doing an update for zuulv3? > This is specific to

[openstack-dev] [infra] Zull retry limit

Hi, It seems like all patches are hitting this issue – “RETRY_LIMIT in 5m 35s”. Any idea? Is this specific to vmware-nsx or all projects? Did we miss doing an update for zuulv3? Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing Lis

[openstack-dev] [infra] pypi publishing

Hi, Any idea why latest packages are not being published to pypi. Examples are: vmware-nsxlib 10.0.2 (latest stable/ocata) vmware-nsxlib 11.0.1 (latest stable/pike) vmware-nsxlib 11.1.0 (latest queens) Did we miss a configuration that we needed to do in the infra projects? Thanks Gary ___

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

One thing that we could consider is adding ‘topy’ [i] to our gating. [i] https://pypi.python.org/pypi/topy On 9/23/17, 2:47 AM, "Michael Johnson" wrote: A recent extreme example: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/494981/1/specs/version0.8/active_passive_loadbalancer.rst I woul

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] Should we continue providing FQDNs for instance hostnames?

On 9/4/17, 3:47 PM, "Stephen Finucane" wrote: On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 11:51 +0000, Gary Kotton wrote: > On 9/4/17, 11:18 AM, "Stephen Finucane" wrote: > > Nova has a feature whereby it will provide instance host names that cloud- > > init c

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] Should we continue providing FQDNs for instance hostnames?

Hi, Your patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/480616/ requires that neutron expose the ‘DNS Integration’ extension be support by neutron and the relevant networking plugin. If it does not then will be a gression and things will not work. In addition to this that is per network and not global s

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-l2gw] pike

Hi, I will do this. Thanks Gary On 8/8/17, 4:47 AM, "Takashi Yamamoto" wrote: hi, who is planning to make stable/pike for networking-l2gw? __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questi

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Error when running quickstart.sh

Sorry, my bad, when setting the guest to have vmkernel6Guest it works. From: Gary Kotton Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Sunday, August 6, 2017 at 6:40 PM To: OpenStack List Subject: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Error when running quickstart.sh Hi, When I do this on a virtual host I get the

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Error when running quickstart.sh

Hi, When I do this on a virtual host I get the following error: Sunday 06 August 2017 08:22:04 -0700 (0:00:02.641) 0:06:45.482 * failed: [127.0.0.2] (item={u'flavor': u'control', u'virtualbmc_port': 6230, u'name': u'control_0'}) => {"failed": true, "item": {"flavor": "control", "n

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Cleaning up inactive meetbot channels

FYI - https://review.openstack.org/486887 We should be using #openstack-neutron instead. On 7/20/17, 8:46 PM, "Graham Hayes" wrote: On 19/07/17 20:24, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > For those who are unaware, Freenode doesn't allow any one user to > /join more than 120 channels concurrentl

[openstack-dev] [neutron][l2-gateway] Added Ricardo Noriega to the core team

Hi, Over the last few months Ricardo Noriega has been making many contributions to the project and has actually helped get it to the stage where it’s a lot healthier than before ☺. I am adding him to the core team. Congratulations! A luta continua Gary

[openstack-dev] [infra] Gerrit slow

Hi, Gerrit is very slow at the moment. Is anyone else hitting this issue? Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe ht

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

Hi, Will this also be moving to eol - https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/stable/mitaka/global-requirements.txt? Thanks Gary On 7/10/17, 9:23 AM, "Andreas Jaeger" wrote: On 2017-07-07 17:37, Doug Szumski wrote: > >> On 2017-07-05 12:13, Joshua Hesketh wrote: >>> Hi a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] Allow passing security groups when attaching interfaces?

Hi, When you attach an interface there are a number of options: 1. Pass a existing port 2. Pass a network In the second case a new port will be created and by default that will have the default security group. You could try the first option by attaching the security group to the port Thanks Gary

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] tempest failures when deploying neutron-server in wsgi with apache

+1 From: Kevin Benton Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Monday, June 19, 2017 at 10:33 AM To: OpenStack List Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] tempest failures when deploying neutron-server in wsgi with apache Thanks. Maybe this would be a good opportunity to just have people start putting

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] security group OVO change

day, June 19, 2017 at 10:01 AM To: OpenStack List Cc: "isaku.yamah...@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] security group OVO change Do you mean the callback event for AFTER_CREATE is missing the rules when it's for default security groups? On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 4:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] security group OVO change

; Thanks and sorry for inconveniences, > Ihar > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 6:17 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The commit https://review.openstack.org/284738 has broken decomposed plugins > > (those that extend security groups and rules).

[openstack-dev] [neutron] security group OVO change

Hi, The commit https://review.openstack.org/284738 has broken decomposed plugins (those that extend security groups and rules). The reason for this is that there is a extend callback that we use which expects to get a database object and the aforementioned patch passes a new neutron object. I ha

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] pep8 breakage

ion bump should be announced because it > potentially breaks individual project gate. > > Is it better to revert pylint version bump in global-requirements, or > just to ignore some pylint rules temporarily in neutron? > > Akihiro > > > 2017-06-07

[openstack-dev] [neutron] pep8 breakage

Hi, Please see bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1696403. Seems like six 1.10.0 has broken us. I have posted a patch in the requirements project. Not 100% sure that this is the right way to go. At least that will enable us to address this in neutron. Thanks Gary

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] pep8 broken

rllib> package. Thanks and sorry for the spam Gary From: Gary Kotton Date: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 at 2:03 PM To: OpenStack List Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] pep8 broken Sorry my bad. The problem is that our requirements use six and in 1.10 files are missing From: Gary Kotton

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] pep8 broken

Sorry my bad. The problem is that our requirements use six and in 1.10 files are missing From: Gary Kotton Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 at 1:00 PM To: OpenStack List Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] pep8 broken Seems like the whole world is broken now: 2017

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] pep8 broken

[1;31mE[0m: 56,16: [1;31mUndefined variable 'depr_func'[0m ([1;31mundefined-variable[0m) 2017-06-07 09:57:03.399683<http://logs.openstack.org/66/471666/2/check/gate-vmware-nsx-pep8-ubuntu-xenial/b1bc4df/console.html#_2017-06-07_09_57_03_399683> | [1;31mE[0m: 56,26: [1;31mUndefine

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] pep8 broken

this was meant to fix it. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/471512/ On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 4:51 AM, Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> wrote: Hi, It seems that the pep8 is broken due to https://github.com/openstack/requirements/commit/99fae827973465147359cc7032c83003802612a7

[openstack-dev] [neutron] pep8 broken

Hi, It seems that the pep8 is broken due to https://github.com/openstack/requirements/commit/99fae827973465147359cc7032c83003802612a7 Should we revert this? Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage ques

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Update for global requirements

Thanks! It seems like https://review.openstack.org/440882 is the problem. Now that we have resolved the issues we should return this. I have proposed patches to return these. Thanks Gary On 6/4/17, 4:15 PM, "Jeremy Stanley" wrote: On 2017-06-04 11:35:16 + (+0000), Gary Ko

[openstack-dev] [infra] Update for global requirements

Hi, The bot that runs for the requirements update sometimes does not update the vmware-nsx project. I am not sure if this happens with other projects. Does anyone know how we can trouble shoot this? Thanks Gary __ OpenStack D

[openstack-dev] [neutron][l2gw] OVS code currently broken

Hi, Please note that the L2 GW code is currently broken due to the commit e6333593ae6005c4b0d73d9dfda5eb47f40dd8da If someone has the cycles can they please take a look. Thanks gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not f

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][Neutron]Why we use secuirity group which only support dispatching whiltelist rules?

Hi, I would like us to think of considering enabling an API that would allow ‘deny’, for example an admin could overwrite a tenant’s security groups. For example, and admin may not want a specific source range to access the tenants VM’s. The guys working on FWaaS say that this may happen in V2,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade

solve them. And probably you need to revisit your unit tests. Please, send me email directly with links for traces, does this happen on master branch, does it happen on one of your changes - it is hard to guess. On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 11:16 AM Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade

of rolling with the punches). I am just concerned if we are the only folks that have affected by this. Thanks Gary From: Gary Kotton Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Monday, April 3, 2017 at 3:14 PM To: OpenStack List Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade Hi, We needed to make all of

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/452539/ is about switching for new facade, does the master branch fails the same? On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 8:35 AM Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> wrote: Yes, sorry my bad for not adding it - http://logs.openstack.org/39/452539/2/check/gate-vmware-nsx-python27-ubuntu-xen

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack] How does tag gets allocated to VM ports ?

Hi, This is done by the agents. For example please see https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/neutron/plugins/ml2/drivers/openvswitch/agent/ovs_neutron_agent.py#L1639 Thanks Gary From: Vikash Kumar Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Monday, April 3, 2017 at 9:46 AM To: OpenStack List Sub

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade

To: OpenStack List Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade Do you have a link to a traceback? On Apr 2, 2017 09:25, "Gary Kotton" mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> wrote: Hi, The change https://review.openstack.org/#/c/402750/ has broken the vmware-nsx plugin. I am not

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade

Hi, The change https://review.openstack.org/#/c/402750/ has broken the vmware-nsx plugin. I am not sure if this has had effect on any other decomposed plugins. One of the issues that we have is when we create a PortDNS object under a transaction we get an exception: DBReferenceError: (sqlite3.Int

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - Adding Miguel Lavalle to neutron-drivers team

+1 On 3/31/17, 12:55 AM, "Ihar Hrachyshka" wrote: On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Kevin Benton wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to add Miguel Lavalle (mlavalle) to the Neutron drivers team > [1]. It's not completely clear if you seek support here, but in case you do,

[openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-l2gw] Project update

Hi, Please see below for a current update on the status of the project. 1. stable/ocata: a. a tag 10.0.0 has been created b. code has been updated to pass unit tests (there was a breakage as it was pulling master neutron) 2. master: a. Due to the tag above being

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-l2gw] Unable to create release tag

Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> wrote: Hi, I have tried updating my gpg key and still nothing works: gkotton@ubuntu:~/networking-l2gw$ git push gerrit tag 10.0.0 Enter passphrase for key '/home/gkotton/.ssh/id_rsa': Counting objects: 1, done.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-l2gw] Unable to create release tag

2gw.git' Any idea here? This is blocking people who want to package… Thanks Gary On 3/21/17, 7:18 PM, "Gary Kotton" wrote: Hi, I am still unable to do this – this is after https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447279/ landed. Any ideas? Thanks Gary On

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-l2gw] Unable to create release tag

Hi, I am still unable to do this – this is after https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447279/ landed. Any ideas? Thanks Gary On 3/14/17, 3:04 PM, "Jeremy Stanley" wrote: On 2017-03-14 05:39:35 + (+0000), Gary Kotton wrote: > I was asked to create a release tag for stabl

[openstack-dev] [neutron][tap-as-a-service] neutron-lib breakage

Hi, Can the tap guys please look at https://review.openstack.org/447277. All projects using the tap project are currently stuck Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack

[openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-l2gw] Unable to create release tag

Hi, I was asked to create a release tag for stable/ocata. This fails with: gkotton@ubuntu:~/networking-l2gw$ git push gerrit tag 10.0.0 Enter passphrase for key '/home/gkotton/.ssh/id_rsa': Counting objects: 1, done. Writing objects: 100% (1/1), 533 bytes | 0 bytes/s, done. Total 1 (delta 0), reus

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][infra] Any idea why patch is not gating

Thanks! 439565 was abandoned. Sorry for the trouble On 3/6/17, 5:32 PM, "Paul Belanger" wrote: On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 03:44:59PM +0000, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > When we recheck https://review.openstack.org/#/c/388157/ or any patch that depends on this one, the

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc][release] stable/ocata version

schedule, even though it > may > cause some cherry-pick, but it is safer and how OpenStack project live. > > > On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Gary Kotton > mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> wrote: >> >> Please note that things are going to start to get messy now – th

[openstack-dev] [neutron][infra] Any idea why patch is not gating

Hi, When we recheck https://review.openstack.org/#/c/388157/ or any patch that depends on this one, they just hang. Any idea why? Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: opensta

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc] stable/ocata version

-dev] [neutron][sfc] stable/ocata version This is talked in [0]. sfc team said ​> we will pull a stable/ocata branch around end of Feb or early March the latest. [0] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-February/112580.html On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Gary Kot

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc] stable/ocata version

the latest. [0] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-February/112580.html On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> wrote: Hi, We are pretty blocked at the moment with our gating on stable/ocata. This is due to the fact that there is no netwo

[openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc] stable/ocata version

Hi, We are pretty blocked at the moment with our gating on stable/ocata. This is due to the fact that there is no networking-sfc version tagged for ocata. Is there any ETA for this? Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailin

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - Neutron team social in Atlanta on Thursday

+1 On 2/20/17, 12:17 AM, "Daniel Alvarez" wrote: +1 Enviado desde mi iPhone > El 19 feb 2017, a las 11:45, Isaku Yamahata escribió: > > +1 > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:18:41AM -0800, > Kevin Benton wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm o

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - Team photo

What is the dress code ☺ From: "Das, Anindita" Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Monday, February 20, 2017 at 5:16 AM To: OpenStack List Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - Team photo +1 From: Kevin Benton Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Fri

[openstack-dev] [neutron][ovo] port bindings

Hi, We have encountered a few issues with the Port object. This makes use of the ml2 database model. Mono lithic plugins do not populate the information and this can lead to breakages. My understanding is that plugin specific objects should be in the directory: neutron/objects/plugins. I am wond

[openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] Stable/Ocata Version

Hi, When will this repo have a stable/ocata branch? Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.o

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [stadium] subprojects on independent release cycle

Regarding vmware-nsx we are planning to cut a version in the coming days. Thanks Gary On 2/8/17, 8:51 PM, "Isaku Yamahata" wrote: Regarding to networking-odl, we're going to cut stable/ocata branch around Feb 11. After a while testing, the release will be done to avoid much delay

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-l2gw] ocata release?

Done - https://review.openstack.org/gitweb?p=openstack/networking-l2gw.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/stable/ocata A luta continua On 2/6/17, 8:51 AM, "Gary Kotton" wrote: Hi, Yes, I will go and do this. Thanks Gary On 2/6/17, 4:05 AM, "Takashi Y

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >