Thanks, Vladimir!
-Dmitry.
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov <
vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> Thanks for you efforts, FFE is granted, please go ahead. I hope we'll get
> it merged by 09/09/2016.
>
> Vladimir Kozhukalov
>
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2
Hi Fuelers,
I would like to ask for a FFE for "Role Decomposition" feature. The spec is
merged and can be fould at [0]. We were unable to land the patch [1] to
Newton in time. So I would like to ask for extension till 09.09.2016 to
land this patch.
Changes made in the patch would introduce concep
od reviewer usually is
>> much harder than a person who can write the code, so it would be much more
>> productive to encourage people to spend as much time as they can on making
>> the project better and helping other contributors, than restricting them to
>> review code fo
Hi Folks,
>From technical standpoint I fully support Arthur to become core reviewer. I
like thorough reviews that he is making.
Although I have some concerns as well. Planned tasks for our team will not
allow Arthur to spend more than 25-30% of his time for reviewing. If that
is fine - my concern
e, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:23:06PM +0300, Dmitry Klenov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to to request a feature freeze exception for "Support for Huge
> > pages for improved performance" feature [0].
> >
> > Part of this feature is already
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:23:08PM +0300, Dmitry Klenov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to to request a feature freeze exception for "Add support for
> > NUMA/CPU pinning features" feature [0].
> >
> > Part of this feature is already
Maksim, good job! +1 from my side though I am not a core.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Aleksey Zvyagintsev <
azvyagint...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Aleksandr Didenko
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Kyrylo Galanov
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +
Hi,
I'd like to to request a feature freeze exception for "Add support for
NUMA/CPU pinning features" feature [0].
Part of this feature is already merged [1]. We have the following patches
in work / on review:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/281802/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/285282/
http
Hi,
I'd like to to request a feature freeze exception for "Support for Huge
pages for improved performance" feature [0].
Part of this feature is already merged [1]. We have the following patches
in work / on review:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/286628/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/282367
Well done, Fedor! Congrats!
-Dmitry.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Maksim Malchuk
wrote:
> Congrats!
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Fedor Zhadaev
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you!
>> --
>> Kind Regards,
>> Fedor Zhadaev
>>
>> skype: zhadaevfm
>> IRC: fzhadaev
>>
>> __
Hi Sergey,
I fully support this idea. It was our plan as well when we were developing
Ubuntu Bootstrap feature. So let's proceed with CentOS bootstrap removal.
BR,
Dmitry.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Sergey Kulanov
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I think it's time to declare CentOS bootstrap image
Hi folks,
I would propose to keep current versioning schema until fuel release
schedule is fully aligned with OpenStack releases. AFAIK it is expected to
happen since 9.0. After it we can switch to OpenStack version names.
BR,
Dmitry.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Igor Kalnitsky
wrote:
> Fo
Hi Mike,
Yes, I agree that we cannot move blueprints to "Implemented" unless all
dependencies are complete (incl tests and doc). Probably we can use "Beta
available" for such tickets instead of "Deployment" as we can already try
the functionality.
All development-related child blueprints for [1]
Hello folks,
I would like to announce that we have completed all items for 'Ubuntu
bootstrap' feature. Thanks to the team for hard work and dedication!
Starting from today Ubuntu bootstrap is enabled in the Fuel by default.
Also it is worth mentioning that Ubuntu bootstrap is integrated with
'Bi
t;
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Dmitry Klenov
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mike and Igor,
>>
>> Thank you for the opinions.
>>
>> We already talked to Matt and he is fine with Fuel Menu commit. We will
>> target the changes for Tuesday and will work with revie
, Igor Kalnitsky
wrote:
> Hey Dmitry,
>
> I'm ok with FFE till Tuesday. Moreover, it makes sense to do so in
> order to reduce affection on CentOS 7 patches.
>
> - Igor
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Dmitry Klenov
> wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
Hi folks,
Let me clarify the situation with Ubuntu bootstrap feature.
First of all, I would like to highlight that all functional commits for
this feature were merged. This means that starting from yesterday everyone
has an ability to switch to Ubuntu-based bootstrap manually and start using
it.
17 matches
Mail list logo
