Hi -
tripleo-validations has a validation[0] that attempts to identify services
that have more than (in its default setting) 8 processes running when the
validation is executed. We've seen in the past, times where too many
processes for each service may have had a significant performance impact
p
Hi -
Yes, planning to keep the manifest, just removing the ping test and the
> code that is dependent on that succeeding.
>
Would the ping test and code be suitable for a TripleO Validation?
https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-validations
Thanks
-dant
>
> Uploading a new PS to reflect t
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 7:08 AM, Alex Schultz wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Dan Trainor wrote:
> > Hi -
> >
> > I'm looking for the glue that populates the overcloud role list.
> >
> > I can get a list of roles via 'openstack overcloud role
HI, Steve -
> I think perhaps the confusion is because this was implemented in
> tripleoclient, and porting it to tripleo-common is not yet completed?
> (Alex can confirm the status of this but it was planned I think).
>
> Related ML discussion which includes links to the patches:
>
> http://list
Hi -
I'm looking for the glue that populates the overcloud role list.
I can get a list of roles via 'openstack overcloud role list', however I'm
looking to create new roles to incorporate in to this list.
I got as far as using 'mistral action-update' against what I beleive to be
the proper actio
Hi -
Is there a way to reset the state of all the validations that have
previously ran, back to the original state they were prior to running?
Using the UI, for example, some validations (by design) run as soon as you
log in. Others run after different actions are completed. But there's a
state
Hi -
In an attempt to work on [0], I've been playing around with proxying all
the service API endpoints that the UI needs to communicate with, through
either haproxy or Apache to avoid a bug[1] around how non-Chrome browsers
handle SSL connections to different ports on the same domain.
The bluepr
+1
On Dec 1, 2016 5:36 PM, "James Slagle" wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> > Team,
> >
> > Alex Schultz (mwhahaha on IRC) has been active on TripleO since a few
> > months now. While he's very active in different areas of TripleO, his
> > reviews and contributio
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Michele Baldessari
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 05:01:49PM +, Dougal Matthews wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to propose we add Julie (jpich) to the TripleO core team for
> > python-tripleoclient and tripleo-common. This nomination is based
> part
ther API.
>
> I actually implemented this scheme in Havana before I joined Red Hat. At
> the time, we had to have a complex HAProxy config and patch the end points
> to support name-based URLs. I think some work has been done in OpenStack
> now to support this model, but I'm no
cloud to be SSL enabled. This would be a good way to move
the idea of a secured, by default SSL-enabled Undercloud forward a little
more, which is something we'd definitely like to see more.
Thoughts?
Thanks
-dant
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Dan Trainor wrote:
> Hi, Juan -
>
&g
's going to take administrative time to
set up and configure outside of OpenStack - do we really want that?
Thanks!
-dant
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Dan Trainor wrote:
>
>> Hi -
>>
>> I want to bring up a subject that needs a little more attention.
Hi -
I want to bring up a subject that needs a little more attention. There are
a few ideas floating around but it's important that we get this done right.
UI is unique in the sense that it operates almost entirely in a browser,
talking directly to service API endpoints which it either figures o
13 matches
Mail list logo
